Re: polar and cartesian
- From: "[Mr.] Lynn Kurtz" <kurtzDELETE-THIS@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 12 Sep 2006 04:48:51 GMT
On 11 Sep 2006 21:06:58 -0700, "vicky" <vikash.vks123@xxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
Friends
As we knowrelation between poler and cartesian co-ordinates are
x=r*cos(t) -------(1) // sorry i
use t for angle theta//
y=r*sin(t) --------(2)
r ^2= x^2+y^2 -------(3)
t= tan^-1(y/x) -------(4)
By equation (1) x_r = cos(t) ----(5)
By equation (3) differentiating w.r.to r we get
x_r= sec(t) -------(6)
why?
I don't see how you came up with sec(t). Remember that the x and y on
the right side of (3) depend on r so you need the chain rule if you
differentiate with respect to r:
2r = 2x * x_r + 2y * y_r
= 2x * cos(t) + 2y * sin(t)
= 2* r * cos(t) * cos(t) + 2 * r * sin(t) * sin(t)
= 2r, not very enlightening but at least consistent, since x^2 + y^2
= r^2 after all.
--Lynn
.
- References:
- polar and cartesian
- From: vicky
- polar and cartesian
- Prev by Date: Re: On elliptic integrals [Pythonesque title deleted]
- Next by Date: Re: some interview questions
- Previous by thread: polar and cartesian
- Next by thread: Re: polar and cartesian
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|