Re: Complete metric quotient spaces
- From: rusty <mr.rusty@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 12 Sep 2006 13:40:20 +0200
William Elliot wrote:
On Tue, 12 Sep 2006, rusty wrote:
It's been posted for a long time and deletes don't always take hold.
The usual way to define a quotient pseudo-metric is as the infimum
of the distances between points in two equivalence classes.
Yes I cancelled the message shortly after lunch yesterday (french time)
and you apparently just replied today to this cancelled mail.
It was posted at 10:58 and cancelled at 14:07 french time.
In my haste I confused two results :What metric is that? Certainly not the metric described a bove.
- For a compact metric space, the quotient will be a (compact) metric
space iff all equivalence classes are closed. (In general for the
quotient to be metrisable each equivalence class must be closed as the
inverse image of a closed set under a continuous mapping!)
Yes the quotient metric d(C_1,C_2) given as the infimum of d(x_1,x_2) where
x_1 runs over C_1 and x_2 over C_2. Since X is compact, there is no problem.
- The topology on a subset of a complete separable metric space can be
given by a complete metric iff the subset is a G_delta.
What's a complete metric?
I wrote "complete separable metric space". Complete and separable are
adjectives that qualify "metric space". Do you have a problem?
--
rusty
.
- References:
- Complete metric quotient spaces
- From: jb
- Re: Complete metric quotient spaces
- From: Jannick Asmus
- Re: Complete metric quotient spaces
- From: jb
- Re: Complete metric quotient spaces
- From: rusty
- Re: Complete metric quotient spaces
- From: William Elliot
- Re: Complete metric quotient spaces
- From: rusty
- Re: Complete metric quotient spaces
- From: William Elliot
- Complete metric quotient spaces
- Prev by Date: Re: some interview questions
- Next by Date: Function integrable for exactly one L^p norm
- Previous by thread: Re: Complete metric quotient spaces
- Next by thread: Re: Complete metric quotient spaces
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|