Re: An uncountable countable set
- From: Han.deBruijn@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: 18 Sep 2006 06:12:32 -0700
Mike Kelly wrote:
Tony Orlow wrote:
it's not true that you can put ten balls in a vase and take one out,
over and over, and ever get an empty vase.
Because you can't physically perform an infinite sequence of operations
in finite time.
No. That's not the real reason. There are many mathematical models of
physical phenomena for which "an infinite sequence of operations in
finite time" is required, like e.g. in Zeno's paradox. The real reason
is that the infinity in the "balls in a vase" paradox is of a vastly
different nature: it cannot be understood as a limiting case of
something finite. It's a jump. And nature doesn't jump.
Han de Bruijn
.
- References:
- Re: An uncountable countable set
- From: Tony Orlow
- Re: An uncountable countable set
- From: David R Tribble
- Re: An uncountable countable set
- From: Tony Orlow
- Re: An uncountable countable set
- From: Dik T. Winter
- Re: An uncountable countable set
- From: Tony Orlow
- Re: An uncountable countable set
- From: Virgil
- Re: An uncountable countable set
- From: Tony Orlow
- Re: An uncountable countable set
- From: Randy Poe
- Re: An uncountable countable set
- From: Tony Orlow
- Re: An uncountable countable set
- From: Mike Kelly
- Re: An uncountable countable set
- From: Mike Kelly
- Re: An uncountable countable set
- Prev by Date: Re: Covering an infinite cylinder with a single chart
- Next by Date: Re: An uncountable countable set
- Previous by thread: Re: An uncountable countable set
- Next by thread: Re: An uncountable countable set
- Index(es):