Re: The sphere is not plane
- From: lrudolph@xxxxxxxxx (Lee Rudolph)
- Date: 21 Sep 2006 09:46:09 -0400
David C. Ullrich <ullrich@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
On 20 Sep 2006 09:01:52 -0400, lrudolph@xxxxxxxxx (Lee Rudolph) wrote:....
This proof has the possible advantage over others that it shows,
not only that there is no homeomorphism from S^2 into C, but that
in fact there is no local homeomorphism from S^2 into C.
Meaning what?
Yeah, I realized about 1 second after posting that that phrase
was, at best, ambiguous. I had been going to say "submersion"
but thought *that* would be too high falutin' (and probably has
"smooth" as part of its definition). Here's a better version:
"This proof has the possible advantage over others that it shows,
not only that there is no homeomorphism from S^2 into C, but that
in fact there is no map f from S^2 into C with the property
that each point P of S^2 has a neighborhood U(P) such that the
restriction of f to U(P) is a homeomorphism from U(P) into S^2."
Lee Rudolph
.
- References:
- The sphere is not plane
- From: José Carlos Santos
- Re: The sphere is not plane
- From: Lee Rudolph
- Re: The sphere is not plane
- From: David C . Ullrich
- The sphere is not plane
- Prev by Date: Re: Analyitic solution to a particular cubic..
- Next by Date: Re: The Crackpot Index
- Previous by thread: Re: The sphere is not plane
- Next by thread: Re: The sphere is not plane
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|