Re: An uncountable countable set
- From: "MoeBlee" <jazzmobe@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 27 Sep 2006 06:47:38 -0700
Han de Bruijn wrote:
MoeBlee wrote:
Tony Orlow wrote:
Constructivism and Axiomatism are two sides of a coin. They can be
reconciled in larger framework, I think.
I don't know what your definition of 'axiomatism' is, but there are
axiomatic systems for constructive mathematics.
True. And I consider that as a distortion of contructivism.
Let's suppose axiomatization conflicts with constructivism. What
exactly do you see that conflict to be? And what do you find so
important in constructivism that upholding it is more important than
the objectivity of axiomatization?
MoeBlee
.
- References:
- Re: An uncountable countable set
- From: Han de Bruijn
- Re: An uncountable countable set
- From: Mike Kelly
- Re: An uncountable countable set
- From: Han de Bruijn
- Re: An uncountable countable set
- From: Han de Bruijn
- Re: An uncountable countable set
- From: Mike Kelly
- Re: An uncountable countable set
- From: Han de Bruijn
- Re: An uncountable countable set
- From: Mike Kelly
- Re: An uncountable countable set
- From: Tony Orlow
- Re: An uncountable countable set
- From: Han de Bruijn
- Re: An uncountable countable set
- From: Tony Orlow
- Re: An uncountable countable set
- From: Virgil
- Re: An uncountable countable set
- From: Tony Orlow
- Re: An uncountable countable set
- From: Han de Bruijn
- Re: An uncountable countable set
- From: Tony Orlow
- Re: An uncountable countable set
- From: MoeBlee
- Re: An uncountable countable set
- From: Han de Bruijn
- Re: An uncountable countable set
- Prev by Date: nullspaces
- Next by Date: question about the 'loves' algorithm
- Previous by thread: Re: An uncountable countable set
- Next by thread: Re: An uncountable countable set
- Index(es):