Banach/Analysis Proof
- From: "Jason Pawloski" <jpawloski@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 28 Sep 2006 10:07:02 -0700
I need to prove the following:
For D a subset of R^n+1, let f:D -> R^n be continuous, and let K be a
compact subset of R^n+1 such that K is a subset of D. Show that there
exists an open subset U of R^n+1 such that K is a subset of U and f is
bounded on U intersect D.
I'm further told to try to construct a proof that would work on an
arbitrary Banach space. I've never had a class that involved Banach
spaces, so I wiki'd it to find its a complete normed vector space.
Since the norm satisfies the triangle inequality, I assume you use the
norm as your distance function in the metric space. Is this correct?
Also, I'm not sure what I should take to be an "arbitrary Banach
space." Is there some convention that its the image or the preimage of
a function? In other words, is f:D-> R^n mean that D should be the
arbitrary Banach space?
Either way, I don't see how to proceed with this proof. Obviously if f
is continuous on a compact set, then it achieves its maximumand minimum
and hence must be bounded. But I don't see how to extend this to an
open set larger than K...
Thanks, Jason
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Banach/Analysis Proof
- From: Robert Israel
- Re: Banach/Analysis Proof
- Prev by Date: Re: Cantor Confusion
- Next by Date: Re: An uncountable countable set
- Previous by thread: Function for the humber of "holes" created when joining vertices of equilateral 2D shapes
- Next by thread: Re: Banach/Analysis Proof
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|