Re: Cantor Confusion
- From: "Poker Joker" <Poker@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 30 Sep 2006 04:45:44 GMT
"Virgil" <virgil@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:virgil-9C1609.21071129092006@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
It is in mathematics. Once a proof for any list is established, it
covers every list.
This list doesn't contain 4:
1
2
3
Proof:
The 1st number isn't 4.
The 2nd number isn't 4.
The 3rd number isn't 4.
That list does't contain 4
Therefore, Virgil believes that in mathematics, no
list contains 4.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Cantor Confusion
- From: *** T. Winter
- Re: Cantor Confusion
- From: Virgil
- Re: Cantor Confusion
- References:
- Re: Cantor Confusion
- From: Arturo Magidin
- Re: Cantor Confusion
- From: Poker Joker
- Re: Cantor Confusion
- From: Alan Morgan
- Re: Cantor Confusion
- From: Poker Joker
- Re: Cantor Confusion
- From: Virgil
- Re: Cantor Confusion
- Prev by Date: Re: An uncountable countable set
- Next by Date: Re: Cantor Confusion
- Previous by thread: Re: Cantor Confusion
- Next by thread: Re: Cantor Confusion
- Index(es):