Re: Cantor Confusion
- From: "guenther vonKnakspot" <apacur@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 2 Oct 2006 02:48:14 -0700
Han.deBruijn@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
guenther vonKnakspot wrote:Then you should consider the notion that your concept of integrity is
Han de Bruijn wrote:
guenther vonKnakspot wrote:Mueckenschleim is a teaching professor at a university whose wages are
What a fallacious imbecile you are, Muckenschleim. Why don't you go
drown your sorry feeble mind in beer at the Oktoberfest? Maybe they
will beat the crap out of you for good there.
Hey, hey ! Would you please mind that this is a mathematics newsgroup
and that you are bringing _mathematics_ into disrepute with this kind
of uncivilized behaviour ? I've always thought that mathematics is a
form of civilization. But it seems that mainstream mathematics is NOT.
payed by taxpayers. He inflicts his fallacious crap upon real students
in full awareness of its incorrectness. There is absolutely nothing
civilized about that. There is nothing about Muckenschleim to elicit
civilized behaviour when dealing with him.
Quite on the contrary: I have no doubt about Mueckenheim's integrity.
not in accordance with the commonly accepted definition.
Regards.
Han de Bruijn
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Cantor Confusion
- From: Han de Bruijn
- Re: Cantor Confusion
- References:
- Re: Cantor Confusion
- From: guenther vonKnakspot
- Re: Cantor Confusion
- From: Han . deBruijn
- Re: Cantor Confusion
- Prev by Date: New mathematics/physical sciences positions at http://jobs.phds.org, October 02, 2006
- Next by Date: FLTMA: A little group theory
- Previous by thread: Re: Cantor Confusion
- Next by thread: Re: Cantor Confusion
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
