Re: non-Noetherian rings
- From: Jannick Asmus <jannick.news@xxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 03 Oct 2006 14:24:53 +0200
On 03.10.2006 13:35, Anvita wrote:
Ever heard of Zorn's Lemma???
Of course. It should have been obvious...
Can this be generalized to finitely generated modules
over rings with 1 ? Namely, is it true that every
such module without maximal submodules is trivial?
*Now* you are heading towards the area of non-noetherian rings and
modules. ;)
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: non-Noetherian rings
- From: Anvita
- Re: non-Noetherian rings
- References:
- non-Noetherian rings
- From: Anvita
- Re: non-Noetherian rings
- From: Paul Sperry
- Re: non-Noetherian rings
- From: Anvita
- Re: non-Noetherian rings
- From: Jannick Asmus
- Re: non-Noetherian rings
- From: Anvita
- non-Noetherian rings
- Prev by Date: Re: latex and word,
- Next by Date: Re: FLTMA: A little group theory
- Previous by thread: Re: non-Noetherian rings
- Next by thread: Re: non-Noetherian rings
- Index(es):
