Re: Cantor Confusion
- From: Virgil <virgil@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 03 Oct 2006 12:36:32 -0600
In article <1159888403.008070.216960@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
"Albrecht" <albstorz@xxxxxx> wrote:
Any proof which shows that infinity is incomprehensible isn't trivial.
It must be a proof, which is working on the limit of the knowable.
Any proof that what is comprehended is incomprehensible is flawed.
.
- Prev by Date: waiting queues
- Next by Date: Re: Cantor Confusion
- Previous by thread: Re: Cantor Confusion
- Next by thread: Re: Cantor Confusion
- Index(es):
