Re: Cantor Confusion

In article <W%BUg.33$LU2.27@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
"Poker Joker" <Poker@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

"Virgil" <virgil@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:virgil-9DF264.21122402102006@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In article <85iUg.28307$8_5.15453@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
"Poker Joker" <Poker@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

"MoeBlee" <jazzmobe@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:1159814263.984188.257200@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

Poker Joker wrote:
I never tried to refute the uncountability of the reals.

Good. And you've not correctly refuted diagonal arguments that prove
the uncountability of the reals.

I don't need to respond to you about Arturo.

Okay, you don't have such a need. Meanwhile, my point stands that your
original remarks about Arturo's post are incorrect.

I asked a question. According to you, the question is incorrect. That's
cute.

P.J. asks questions that assume conditions contrary to fact.

Virgil babbles because he is incapable of understanding.

PJ has no specific points on which he can show me wrong so he claims I
babble.

Whereas I, and others, have show him wrong on specific issues for which
his only rebuttal is to claim his critics are babbling.

Too weak to be a valid rebuttal, PJ. You will have to try harder.
.

Quantcast