Re: An uncountable countable set
- From: Han de Bruijn <Han.deBruijn@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 05 Oct 2006 12:58:31 +0200
Mike Kelly wrote:
Han de Bruijn wrote:
Mike Kelly wrote:
Han de Bruijn wrote:
Quote [ Randy Poe ] : Physicists also
realize that things can exist in mathematics that aren't even
approximations of a physical realizable. That aren't physically
sensible in other words.
That's only true for non-disciplinary mathematics.
What is non-disciplinary mathematics? Is it not mathematics?
It is mathematics without the discipline.
[ ... First guess snipped ... ]
Second guess was "mathematics that is not liked by Han".
Not liked by Carl Friedrich Gauss as well. I'm in fairly good company.
Han de Bruijn
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: An uncountable countable set
- From: Virgil
- Re: An uncountable countable set
- From: Mike Kelly
- Re: An uncountable countable set
- References:
- Re: An uncountable countable set
- From: Han de Bruijn
- Re: An uncountable countable set
- From: Tony Orlow
- Re: An uncountable countable set
- From: Virgil
- Re: An uncountable countable set
- From: Tony Orlow
- Re: An uncountable countable set
- From: Mike Kelly
- Re: An uncountable countable set
- From: Lester Zick
- Re: An uncountable countable set
- From: Randy Poe
- Re: An uncountable countable set
- From: Han de Bruijn
- Re: An uncountable countable set
- From: Mike Kelly
- Re: An uncountable countable set
- From: Han de Bruijn
- Re: An uncountable countable set
- From: Mike Kelly
- Re: An uncountable countable set
- Prev by Date: Re: FLTMA: A little group theory
- Next by Date: Re: Group Theory
- Previous by thread: Re: An uncountable countable set
- Next by thread: Re: An uncountable countable set
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|