Re: FLTMA: A little group theory
- From: "The Dougster" <DGoncz@xxxxxxx>
- Date: 5 Oct 2006 18:07:06 -0700
Let me summarize.
The whole point of this thread is to see if we can show that there are
no counterexamples to FLT, because there are no primitive
counterexamples, because there are no candidate counterexamples
(x,y,z,p) with
(1) p odd prime
(2) gcd(x,y,z) =1 or x,y,z pairwise coprime
(3) exactly one of {x,y,z) even
(4) x<y<z<(z+y)
(5) (x^p + y^p) == 0 mod z
(6) (z^p - x^p) == 0 mod y
(7) (z^p - y^p) == 0 mod x
using group theory or whatever we happen to have lying around. :)
I think I left out a condition....there were 8, weren't there? Er....
Doug
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: FLTMA: A little group theory
- From: Gerry Myerson
- Re: FLTMA: A little group theory
- References:
- FLTMA: A little group theory
- From: The Dougster
- Re: FLTMA: A little group theory
- From: Chip Eastham
- Re: FLTMA: A little group theory
- From: The Dougster
- Re: FLTMA: A little group theory
- From: Chip Eastham
- Re: FLTMA: A little group theory
- From: The Dougster
- Re: FLTMA: A little group theory
- From: Chip Eastham
- Re: FLTMA: A little group theory
- From: The Dougster
- Re: FLTMA: A little group theory
- From: The Dougster
- Re: FLTMA: A little group theory
- From: Gottfried Helms
- Re: FLTMA: A little group theory
- From: The Dougster
- FLTMA: A little group theory
- Prev by Date: Re: Handmade Replica Watch
- Next by Date: Re: JSH: Class number idea fails?
- Previous by thread: Re: FLTMA: A little group theory
- Next by thread: Re: FLTMA: A little group theory
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|