Re: FLTMA: A little group theory
- From: Gerry Myerson <gerry@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 06 Oct 2006 02:29:45 GMT
In article <1160096826.870833.309200@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
"The Dougster" <DGoncz@xxxxxxx> wrote:
Let me summarize.
The whole point of this thread is to see if we can show that there are
no counterexamples to FLT, because there are no primitive
counterexamples, because there are no candidate counterexamples
(x,y,z,p) with
(1) p odd prime
(2) gcd(x,y,z) =1 or x,y,z pairwise coprime
(3) exactly one of {x,y,z) even
(4) x<y<z<(z+y)
(5) (x^p + y^p) == 0 mod z
(6) (z^p - x^p) == 0 mod y
(7) (z^p - y^p) == 0 mod x
using group theory or whatever we happen to have lying around. :)
Unless whatever you happen to have lying around includes
Galois representations and the like, your chances of success
are pretty much zero.
--
Gerry Myerson (gerry@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx) (i -> u for email)
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: FLTMA: A little group theory
- From: The Dougster
- Re: FLTMA: A little group theory
- References:
- FLTMA: A little group theory
- From: The Dougster
- Re: FLTMA: A little group theory
- From: Chip Eastham
- Re: FLTMA: A little group theory
- From: The Dougster
- Re: FLTMA: A little group theory
- From: Chip Eastham
- Re: FLTMA: A little group theory
- From: The Dougster
- Re: FLTMA: A little group theory
- From: Chip Eastham
- Re: FLTMA: A little group theory
- From: The Dougster
- Re: FLTMA: A little group theory
- From: The Dougster
- Re: FLTMA: A little group theory
- From: Gottfried Helms
- Re: FLTMA: A little group theory
- From: The Dougster
- Re: FLTMA: A little group theory
- From: The Dougster
- FLTMA: A little group theory
- Prev by Date: Re: probability space: how to understand the following?
- Next by Date: Re: non-Noetherian rings
- Previous by thread: Re: FLTMA: A little group theory
- Next by thread: Re: FLTMA: A little group theory
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|