Re: HOW TO SOLVE THIS



[Lee Rudolph <lrudolph@xxxxxxxxx>]
That's a really boring question. A bit more interesting: if the cube
is cut by a single plane (not necessarily parallel to some side of
the cube) into two parts of volumes .3 and .7, what is the *maximum*
total surface area of the parts, and what is the *minimum*?
[...]

And what is the maximum total area you can possibly get by
cutting a 1x1x1 cube by a plane, if you do not constrain the
partition volumes?

--
Pouya D. Tafti
p dot d dot tafti at ieee dot org
.



Relevant Pages

  • Re: HOW TO SOLVE THIS
    ... is cut by a single plane (not necessarily parallel to some side of ... the cube) into two parts of volumes .3 and .7, ... of the intersection of the unit cube ... It _is_ easy to see that the hexagon at the intersection ...
    (sci.math)
  • Re: HOW TO SOLVE THIS
    ... is cut by a single plane (not necessarily parallel to some side of ... the cube) into two parts of volumes .3 and .7, ... Lee Rudolph ...
    (sci.math)
  • Re: Small Practice Amp - Which one.
    ... I was so impressed with mine I'm very tempted to get a Cube 60 as ... an alternative to my Twin, which is *way* too heavy for me to move. ... pipex .dot. ... (Remove any digits from the addresses when mailing me.) ...
    (uk.music.guitar)