Re: Cantor Confusion
- From: "Tonico" <Tonicopm@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 7 Oct 2006 05:36:16 -0700
Han.deBru...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
*** T. Winter schreef:***********************************************************
Also when somebody writes a bold statement that the axiom of infinity
leads to nonsense, that is just opinion, and nothing more than that.
Wherefore by their fruits ye shall know them (Matthew 7:20).
For example the Balls in a Vase problem clearly shows what nonsense is
the consequence of contemporary mathematical thinking. There is no need
for further argumentation.
Han de Bruijn
I'll be candorously innocent...Han, please: what nonsense is that
you're talking about related to the vase balls problem, and how does it
come from "contemporary mathematical thinking"? And what would this
"contemporary mathematical thinking" be?
I wonder whether I'll get a response...
Regards
Tonio
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Cantor Confusion
- From: Han . deBruijn
- Re: Cantor Confusion
- References:
- Re: Cantor Confusion
- From: Albrecht
- Re: Cantor Confusion
- From: Albrecht
- Re: Cantor Confusion
- From: *** T. Winter
- Re: Cantor Confusion
- From: Han . deBruijn
- Re: Cantor Confusion
- Prev by Date: Re: Cantor Confusion
- Next by Date: Sufficient condition for the Existance of unique solution of a Diff equation
- Previous by thread: Re: Cantor Confusion
- Next by thread: Re: Cantor Confusion
- Index(es):