Re: An uncountable countable set
- From: Tony Orlow <tony@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 08 Oct 2006 14:46:15 -0400
Virgil wrote:
In article <45287609@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
Tony Orlow <tony@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Mike Kelly wrote:
Less than any finite distance. Silly!They have to be infinitely close, so actually, they have anAnd what the *** does "infinitely close" mean, anyway?
infinitesimal segment between them. :)
Zero is a finite distance, so it is TO who is being silly.
If the distance between two points is 0, there is only one point.
Besides which, infinitesimal segments, if they exist at all, are infinitely bisectable.
You will not find any new standard reals in that interval besides the one which is equal to the points at both ends. ANy two standard reals have a finite difference. That's why you can find another between them.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: An uncountable countable set
- From: Virgil
- Re: An uncountable countable set
- References:
- Re: An uncountable countable set
- From: Virgil
- Re: An uncountable countable set
- From: Tony Orlow
- Re: An uncountable countable set
- From: Virgil
- Re: An uncountable countable set
- From: Tony Orlow
- Re: An uncountable countable set
- From: Virgil
- Re: An uncountable countable set
- From: Tony Orlow
- Re: An uncountable countable set
- From: David R Tribble
- Re: An uncountable countable set
- From: Tony Orlow
- Re: An uncountable countable set
- From: Mike Kelly
- Re: An uncountable countable set
- From: Tony Orlow
- Re: An uncountable countable set
- From: Virgil
- Re: An uncountable countable set
- Prev by Date: Re: An uncountable countable set
- Next by Date: Re: is f(x) = ax+b a linear function?
- Previous by thread: Re: An uncountable countable set
- Next by thread: Re: An uncountable countable set
- Index(es):