Re: I-adic completions
- From: Jannick Asmus <jannick.news@xxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 09 Oct 2006 14:07:59 +0200
On 09.10.2006 14:00, Jannick Asmus wrote:
On 07.10.2006 10:22, Jannick Asmus wrote:
On 07.10.2006 04:37, canadan wrote:
Let A be a noetherian ring and I contained in J ideals. If A isIf I and J are arbitrary ideals with I contained in J, the assertion
J-adically complete then A is I-adically complete. Why?
I believe that it has to do with the Artin-Rees theorem.
does not seem to be true to me. Is it possible that J denotes the
nilradical of A?
... or, more generally, that J is contained in the nilradical of A?
However, the assertion as you stated is not true.
Counterexample: Let A=k[[X]], J=<X> and I=<X(X-1)>.
The sequence {X^n} is Cauchy in (A,I), since X^n-X^(n-1) converges to 0
in (A,I). The sequence converges to 0 in (A,J). If (A,I) was complete,
then {X^n} would converge to 0 in (A,I), too, since (A,I) is Hausdorff
and the identity map (A,I) -> (A,J) is continuous. But no X^n is
contained in any I^k which means in other words that {X^n} does not
converge to 0. Contradiction!
Withdrawn - since I=J because of the fact that X-1 is a unit in A. :-(
.
- References:
- I-adic completions
- From: canadan
- Re: I-adic completions
- From: Jannick Asmus
- Re: I-adic completions
- From: Jannick Asmus
- I-adic completions
- Prev by Date: Re: I-adic completions
- Next by Date: Re: Probable Prime Number
- Previous by thread: Re: I-adic completions
- Next by thread: Re: I-adic completions
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|