Re: FLTMA: A little group theory
- From: "Aluminium Holocene Holodeck Zoroaster" <QncyMI@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 11 Oct 2006 19:24:36 -0700
funny you should mention The Wheel; unfortunately,
for those of us interested in preinventing it,
_The Bicycle Wheel_ was taken offline & put back in print,
maybe because of our dyscussion of it,
on a Bucky Fuller listserver. anyway, you can see, why,
the Wright bros. were so savvy, knowing this little system,
which we have preliminarily classified in terms
of "tensegrity."
as for top-posting,
ettiquette is less important than repetitive strain injury
from unneeded "scrolling" --
work it out on your life's palimpsest!
(that is to say, if you can't follow implications
in a "thread" in written English, there's a class for you
at the local community college: EFL.
Since I've brought up Usenet etiquette, perhaps I could ask you
to refrain from top-posting.
thus:
oops, I'd put the wrong URL in my sig, because
of the "W05" in two of them (well,
the other article is good, two). I want to quote
from the PDF -- I will!...
I discovered this construction while contemplating
a fragment from Diophantus' lost work "On Polygonal
Numbers," which describes a proposition
by the classical Greek geometer Hypsicles:
"There has also been proved what was stated
by Hypsicles in a definition, namely, that 'if
there be as many numbers as we please beginning
from 1 and increasing by the same common difference ...'"
--it takes some to jitterbug!
http://members.tripod.com/~american_almanac
http://www.21stcenturysciencetech.com/2006_articles/Keplerian.W05.pdf
http://www.rwgrayprojects.com/synergetics/plates/figs/plate01.html
http://larouchepub.com/other/2006/3322_ethanol_no_science.html
http://www.wlym.com/pdf/iclc/howthenation.pdf
.
- References:
- Re: FLTMA: A little group theory
- From: The Dougster
- Re: FLTMA: A little group theory
- From: Chip Eastham
- Re: FLTMA: A little group theory
- From: The Dougster
- Re: FLTMA: A little group theory
- From: Chip Eastham
- Re: FLTMA: A little group theory
- From: The Dougster
- Re: FLTMA: A little group theory
- From: The Dougster
- Re: FLTMA: A little group theory
- From: Gottfried Helms
- Re: FLTMA: A little group theory
- From: The Dougster
- Re: FLTMA: A little group theory
- From: The Dougster
- Re: FLTMA: A little group theory
- From: Gerry Myerson
- Re: FLTMA: A little group theory
- From: The Dougster
- Re: FLTMA: A little group theory
- From: Gerry Myerson
- Re: FLTMA: A little group theory
- From: The Dougster
- Re: FLTMA: A little group theory
- From: Gerry Myerson
- Re: FLTMA: A little group theory
- From: The Dougster
- Re: FLTMA: A little group theory
- Prev by Date: Re: Cantor Confusion
- Next by Date: Re: Cantor Confusion
- Previous by thread: Re: FLTMA: A little group theory
- Next by thread: Re: FLTMA: A little group theory
- Index(es):