Re: Cantor Confusion
- From: "Poker Joker" <Poker@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 12 Oct 2006 02:40:53 GMT
"Virgil" <virgil@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:virgil-1F12E7.17222503102006@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In article <TVBUg.27$LU2.7@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
"Poker Joker" <Poker@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
"Virgil" <virgil@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:virgil-C9AC49.20550702102006@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
I'm sure you still won't understand.
The context of "list" in which "any list" occured required such lists
to be functions from the naturals to the reals, which The Poker's
pseudolists are not.
Ergo, the Poker is committing the fallacy of the straw man, which echos
the contents of his head quite well.
Virgil obviously can't understand.
No one need even try to understand what contains as little sense as PJ's
claims.
Virgil is so ignorant that she can't write sentences.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Cantor Confusion
- From: William Hughes
- Re: Cantor Confusion
- References:
- Re: Cantor Confusion
- From: Poker Joker
- Re: Cantor Confusion
- From: Virgil
- Re: Cantor Confusion
- From: Poker Joker
- Re: Cantor Confusion
- From: *** T. Winter
- Re: Cantor Confusion
- From: Poker Joker
- Re: Cantor Confusion
- From: Virgil
- Re: Cantor Confusion
- From: Poker Joker
- Re: Cantor Confusion
- From: Virgil
- Re: Cantor Confusion
- Prev by Date: Re: FLTMA: A little group theory
- Next by Date: Re: Cantor Confusion
- Previous by thread: Re: Cantor Confusion
- Next by thread: Re: Cantor Confusion
- Index(es):