Re: twin prime conjecture
- From: Gerry Myerson <gerry@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 12 Oct 2006 23:21:45 GMT
In article <87fydu6kx3.fsf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
Phil Carmody <thefatphil_demunged@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Gerry Myerson <gerry@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
In article <1160567009.355920.117830@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
"larry.freeman@xxxxxxxxx" <larry.freeman@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
OK, here's the solution to one more of your problems (2 more to go):
OK. But you can stop now - you've made your point
(unless of course you're enjoying this, in which case,
be my guest).
I suspect Larry was unfamiliar with the number of incompetant
doofi we get here in sci.math who make bold claims. Almost
all of which are unable to demonstrate _any_ ability in the
field in which they claim to have made a breakthrough.
Hence your challenge, which I'm sure you didn't expect any
sensible replies to, and you'd be right 99% of the time.
So Gerry - are you actually going to waste your time looking
at the paper, now that you've wasted Larry's time with those
questions? :-D
I would feel obliged to look at the proof, but someone else
spared me the effort.
I've not looked at it, but I would be willing to bet that
it's "sieve method that doesn't consider error bounds". It
almost always is. There is a standard sieve methods text,
it's almost certainly way above my level:
H. Halberstam and H. E. Richert. (1974). Sieve Methods.
Academic Press, London, 1974. ISBN 0-12-318250-6
If anyone could recommend a text which aims a little lower,
introducing the subject to someone like myself, I'd be very
grateful.
There are a couple of chapters about sieves in Bateman & Diamond,
Analytic Number Theory, An Introductory Course, World Scientific,
2004. Might be worth a look.
--
Gerry Myerson (gerry@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx) (i -> u for email)
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: twin prime conjecture
- From: Phil Carmody
- Re: twin prime conjecture
- References:
- twin prime conjecture
- From: larry.freeman@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: twin prime conjecture
- From: larry.freeman@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: twin prime conjecture
- From: Gerry Myerson
- Re: twin prime conjecture
- From: larry.freeman@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: twin prime conjecture
- From: Gerry Myerson
- Re: twin prime conjecture
- From: larry.freeman@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: twin prime conjecture
- From: Gerry Myerson
- Re: twin prime conjecture
- From: Phil Carmody
- twin prime conjecture
- Prev by Date: how to compute confidence intervals from log-transformed parameters?
- Next by Date: Re: define the division of X/Y
- Previous by thread: Re: twin prime conjecture
- Next by thread: Re: twin prime conjecture
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|