Re: An uncountable countable set
- From: stephen@xxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Fri, 13 Oct 2006 18:53:24 +0000 (UTC)
Tony Orlow <tony@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
stephen@xxxxxxxxxx wrote:
Randy Poe <poespam-trap@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Tony Orlow wrote:
Mike Kelly wrote:
Tony Orlow wrote:Ah, but if noon is not part of the sequence, then nothing from the
cbrown@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:Ah, but noon is not a part of the sequence of iterations. No more than
Tony Orlow wrote:If it's a question specifically about the labels, as that is, then it's
Virgil wrote:Do you think that the numbering of the balls is not relevant to
In article <452d11ca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,The original statement contrasted two situations which both matched this
Tony Orlow <tony@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
That deliberately and specifically omits the requirement of identifyingI'm sorry, but I can't separate your statement of the problem from yourThe sequence of events consists of adding 10 and removing 1, an infinite
conclusions. Please give just the statement.
number of times. In other words, it's an infinite series of (+10-1).
and tracking each ball individually as required in the originally stated
problem, in which each ball is uniquely identified and tracked.
scenario. The difference between them was the label on the ball removed
at each iteration, and yet, that's not relevant to how many balls are in
the vase at, or before, noon.
determining the answer to the question "Is there a ball labelled 15 in
the vase at 1/20 second before midnight?"
Cheers - Chas
relevant. It's not relevant to the number of balls in the vase at any
time, as long as the sequence of inserting 10 and removing 1 is the same.
Tony
0 is an element of the sequence 1, 1/2, 1/4, 1/8, ....
The question asks how many balls are in the vase at noon. Not at some
iteration.
sequence has anything whatsoever to do with how many balls are in the
vase at noon.
No, there's one of your leaps again.
That's a particularly weird one.
"If the value at noon doesn't have THIS to do with the
sequence, then it must not have ANYTHING to do with
the sequence".
There's no reason to make such a leap.
- Randy
Actually I think Tony is right on this one. The
sequence Tony is talking about is
1, 9, 18, 27, ...
Uh, starts with 0, but do go on...
This sequence represents the number of balls at times before
noon. The sequence has nothing to do with the number of
balls at noon, as the value for noon does not appear in
the sequence. This is why nobody who argues that the
vase is empty at noon ever mentions such a sequence, and
instead point out the simple fact that each ball added
before noon is removed before noon.
Stephen
So, the infinite sequence of finite iterations where we can actually
tell exactly how many balls are in the vase has nothing to do with the
vase's state at noon, which is supposed to be the limit of this
sequence?
Who ever said it was the limit of this sequence?
Why even mention the gedanken at all then?
I am not the one who brought it up. I am not even sure
why people think it has anything to do with set theory.
The whole argument is simply that if -(1/2)^floor(n/10) is
less than zero (the minutes before noon that the ball is added),
then -(1/2)^n is less than zero (the minutes before noon the
ball is removed). This really does not rely on set theory.
I suppose every
vase is empty at noon, or just whatever you feel like declaring. You're
playing silly magic tricks. I'm ashamed for the planet.
The only argument I am making is that each ball that is added
before noon is removed before noon. Of course by supposing that
an infinite number of actions can be performed we are playing
silly magic tricks. This is not a physical problem. Insisting
on a physical answer to an unphysical problem is pointless.
Stephen
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: An uncountable countable set
- From: Tony Orlow
- Re: An uncountable countable set
- References:
- Re: An uncountable countable set
- From: Virgil
- Re: An uncountable countable set
- From: Tony Orlow
- Re: An uncountable countable set
- From: Virgil
- Re: An uncountable countable set
- From: Tony Orlow
- Re: An uncountable countable set
- From: cbrown
- Re: An uncountable countable set
- From: Tony Orlow
- Re: An uncountable countable set
- From: Mike Kelly
- Re: An uncountable countable set
- From: Tony Orlow
- Re: An uncountable countable set
- From: Randy Poe
- Re: An uncountable countable set
- From: stephen
- Re: An uncountable countable set
- From: Tony Orlow
- Re: An uncountable countable set
- Prev by Date: Re: showing "onto"
- Next by Date: Re: showing "onto"
- Previous by thread: Re: An uncountable countable set
- Next by thread: Re: An uncountable countable set
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|