Fifteen months.

About the paper "Hyperbolic classification of natural numbers and Goldbach conjecture"

See:

http://mathforum.org/kb/message.jspa?messageID=5116035&tstart=0

I express:

That in the 15 months in which the paper has been in public knowledge, all comments about it have been related to opinion and first impressions (probably quite sincere), but none have been related to technical and/or conceptual mistakes.

On November 17th I will let you know if there are any changes to that respect.

Fernando

P.S. This message is only placed as a means to a testimony, with no other motive.
.

Relevant Pages

  • Seventeen months.
    ... About the paper "Hyperbolic classification of natural ... numbers and Goldbach conjecture" ... public knowledge, all comments about it have been ... testimony, with no other motive. ...
    (sci.math)
  • Fourteen months.
    ... About the paper "Hyperbolic classification of natural numbers and Goldbach conjecture", ... In the fourteen months in which the mentioned paper is of public knowledge, all the references about it, are related with opinions, but none of them have to do with technical or conceptual flaws. ...
    (sci.math)
  • ... and twenty four months.
    ... About the paper "Hyperbolic Classification of Natural ... numbers and Goldbach Conjecture" ... proof valid on an infinite set of bi parametrical structures ...
    (sci.math)
  • Eighteen months
    ... About the paper "Hyperbolic Classification of Natural ... numbers and Goldbach conjecture" ... Conjecture in an infinite set of even numbers that ... This characterization is due to technical reasons, ...
    (sci.math)
  • Nineteen months.
    ... About the paper "Hyperbolic Classification of Natural ... numbers and Goldbach conjecture" ... interchanging mathematical questions about the mentioned paper. ...
    (sci.math)