Re: Pure Math and Applied Math
- From: sg552@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: 17 Oct 2006 17:25:46 -0700
Rotwang wrote:
OK James, here, as advertised, I will present a python script to verify formal proofs of statements in zeroth order logic with the usual axioms and rule of inference.
[snip]
Hmmm....you think you succeeded?
As I said, it worked for all the trial inputs I tried.
Ok, how about a test then? Prove 1+1 = 2.
Since my program is a proof checker, not a theorem prover, that
question is irrelevant. Also, since my program checks proofs in zeroth
order logic, and since the statement you asked me to prove is not a
statement in zeroth order logic, your question is doubly irrelevant.
Why not just cut your losses and admit that you haven't understood a
word of the actual maths that I have written? Or, better still,
actually learn something so you can check for yourself whether the
program I gave does what I said it does, which is precisely an example
of what your challenge asked me to do (whether you realised it or not).
Check out http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Propositional_calculus , in
particular the section labelled "Example 1. Simple axiom system".
-Rotwang
.
- References:
- Re: Pure Math and Applied Math
- From: Rotwang
- Re: Pure Math and Applied Math
- From: jstevh
- Re: Pure Math and Applied Math
- Prev by Date: Re: JSH: They fail in reply to me all the time
- Next by Date: Re: Solution to this problem?
- Previous by thread: Re: Pure Math and Applied Math
- Next by thread: Re: JSH: Pure Math and Applied Math
- Index(es):