Re: FLTMA: A little group theory
- From: "Chip Eastham" <hardmath@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 21 Oct 2006 06:58:52 -0700
The Dougster wrote:
Ah. The order of -1 is 2. | < -1 > | = 2. < -1 > = { -1, 1 }.
How do we know that if w^n == -1 mod z that
| < -1 > | divides | < w > | ?
Since <-1> is a subgroup of <w>, order of -1 (two) divides
the order of w.
regards, chip
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: FLTMA: A little group theory
- From: The Dougster
- Re: FLTMA: A little group theory
- From: The Dougster
- Re: FLTMA: A little group theory
- References:
- Re: FLTMA: A little group theory
- From: The Dougster
- Re: FLTMA: A little group theory
- From: Chip Eastham
- Re: FLTMA: A little group theory
- From: The Dougster
- Re: FLTMA: A little group theory
- From: Chip Eastham
- Re: FLTMA: A little group theory
- From: The Dougster
- Re: FLTMA: A little group theory
- From: The Dougster
- Re: FLTMA: A little group theory
- From: The Dougster
- Re: FLTMA: A little group theory
- From: The Dougster
- Re: FLTMA: A little group theory
- From: Chip Eastham
- Re: FLTMA: A little group theory
- From: The Dougster
- Re: FLTMA: A little group theory
- From: The Dougster
- Re: FLTMA: A little group theory
- From: Chip Eastham
- Re: FLTMA: A little group theory
- From: The Dougster
- Re: FLTMA: A little group theory
- From: Chip Eastham
- Re: FLTMA: A little group theory
- From: The Dougster
- Re: FLTMA: A little group theory
- Prev by Date: Re: 0^0
- Next by Date: Re: graph planarity - simple algorithms
- Previous by thread: Re: FLTMA: A little group theory
- Next by thread: Re: FLTMA: A little group theory
- Index(es):