Re: JSH: Take a breath


jstevh@xxxxxxx wrote:
gjedwards@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
jstevh@xxxxxxx wrote:
Aatu Koskensilta wrote:
jstevh@xxxxxxx wrote:
By "you people" I mean the sci.math newsgroup and you people bring
comfort to the leadership in the math community.

I rather doubt "the leadership in the math community" finds any comfort
in my USENET posts.


Of course not, you worship them.

If they worry that maybe my ideas are gaining ground they can come here
and read posters attacking me personally, ridiculing my ideas, and
keeping the crowd in check.

Right.

--
Aatu Koskensilta (aatu.koskensilta@xxxxxxxxx)

"Wovon man nicht sprechen kann, daruber muss man schweigen"

Hey, if those people were as intelligent as you probably think they
are, then they would not stupidly sit back hoping that some sci.math
people could stop me with obtuseness and ridicule as after I get
through here, I'm going to make sure they answer for their behavior.

And how hard will it be to prove when the full machinery of the
civilized world will be upon them, subpoenas on their emails, taking
their computers in custody to read hard drives, questioning of their
colleagues and students to see how much they knew and when?

You people forget the power of the world to find the truth when it has
a reason.

So I think they stupidly trusted sci.math'ers to hold the line, and
even now are waiting now with NO OTHER OPTIONS because they are now
boxed in, with people like you still believing in them, when I say,
they were never quite smart enough for the reality of the situation.


James Harris

Hi James,

Just a quick question I hope you can help answer. You predict this sort
of thing (civilized world questioning the evil of mathematicians when
it turns out you are right) EVERY SINGLE TIME. But yet...it never
happens. Please explain the difference between the last time and this
one?

Matter of degree. I keep up with streams of information you people
must ignore.

The world has shifted in its trust of mathematicians.

That shift has to reach a critical level for it to be obvious to
everyone.

But then it will be a critical shift.

I can look at small cracks that appear based on things like Google
search results among other data.

Google search results in any number of areas in mathematics shift as
people around the world begin to question.

When the situation goes critical they will not only sweep through with
full force, but there will be no stopping them, and no time for people
like you to get away with trying to talk your way out of the situation.

It will be like a bang. Like overnight, the situation will change, and
you will find that you simply have no options and no defense.

What is the mathematical area? I think it's catastrophe theory? Or is
it chaos theory?

Anyone with some knowledge on the subject care to explain a bit better
than I just did, including the why of critical mass?


James Harris

Oh, OK, that makes sense. I thought maybe all the last lot of threats
were just the ravings of a moron on Usenet, but now I understand.

.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: JSH: Take a breath
    ... I rather doubt "the leadership in the math community" finds any comfort ... The world has shifted in its trust of mathematicians. ...
    (sci.math)
  • Re: JSH: Take a breath
    ... I rather doubt "the leadership in the math community" finds any comfort ... The world has shifted in its trust of mathematicians. ...
    (sci.math)
  • JSH: Unfair burden
    ... Surrogate factoring is my answer to a math community that does not ... Mathematicians are still fighting to ignore my research which pushes ... IN answer I get lies about even the most basic mathematics so that the ...
    (sci.math)
  • Re: JSH: Contradictory behavior, issue of math fraud
    ... Let's say that down the line someone proves that surrogate factoring ... Your prime counting function works fine. ... But mathematicians have said it's not important, ... But the math community ignores it or posters on sci.math say it's not ...
    (sci.math)