Re: FLTMA: A little group theory
- From: "The Dougster" <DGoncz@xxxxxxx>
- Date: 24 Oct 2006 03:51:04 -0700
I'd asked about those conclusions which can be drawn from FLT as
stated, without loss of generality.
Charles Daney writes at http://www.mbay.net/~cgd/flt/flt08.htm that"
To begin with, various routine calculations enable us to make some
useful simplifying assumptions, without loss of generality. For
instance, n may be supposed to be prime and 5. b can be assumed to be
even, a 3 (mod 4), and c 1 mod 4. a, b, and c can be assumed
relatively prime.
That's as good a start as I have seen.
Doug
.
- References:
- Re: FLTMA: A little group theory
- From: The Dougster
- Re: FLTMA: A little group theory
- From: The Dougster
- Re: FLTMA: A little group theory
- From: The Dougster
- Re: FLTMA: A little group theory
- From: The Dougster
- Re: FLTMA: A little group theory
- From: Chip Eastham
- Re: FLTMA: A little group theory
- From: The Dougster
- Re: FLTMA: A little group theory
- From: The Dougster
- Re: FLTMA: A little group theory
- From: Chip Eastham
- Re: FLTMA: A little group theory
- From: The Dougster
- Re: FLTMA: A little group theory
- From: Chip Eastham
- Re: FLTMA: A little group theory
- From: The Dougster
- Re: FLTMA: A little group theory
- From: Chip Eastham
- Re: FLTMA: A little group theory
- From: The Dougster
- Re: FLTMA: A little group theory
- From: The Dougster
- Re: FLTMA: A little group theory
- From: The Dougster
- Re: FLTMA: A little group theory
- Prev by Date: Re: intersection of compact sets
- Next by Date: Re: Cantor Confusion
- Previous by thread: Re: FLTMA: A little group theory
- Next by thread: Re: FLTMA: A little group theory
- Index(es):
Loading