Re: FLTMA: A little group theory
- From: "The Dougster" <DGoncz@xxxxxxx>
- Date: 24 Oct 2006 00:42:18 -0700
The Dougster wrote:
The Dougster wrote:
Chip Eastham wrote:
The Dougster wrote:
Ah. The order of -1 is 2. | < -1 > | = 2. < -1 > = { -1, 1 }.
How do we know that if w^n == -1 mod z that
| < -1 > | divides | < w > | ?
Since <-1> is a subgroup of <w>, order of -1 (two) divides
the order of w.
Yipee! We're starting to use group theory to explore FLT!
http://www.mathpages.com/home/kmath264.htm
I think I see this more clearly today. If some power of w == -1 mod z
then, knowing w^0 = 1, we have { 1, -1 } <= <w> and so |<-1>| divides
|<w>|, where <= means "is a subgroup of".
I see in many sources on the web that without loss of generality,
certain conclusions may be made from a^n + b^n = c^n in Z. I have
concluded, with help here in sci.math, that exactly one of {x,y,z} is
even, and x < y < z < x+y. It might be more useful to give up x < y < z
< x+y and find instead that, say, y is even, as some web sources have.
I am still searching with Google for "Fermat's last theorem" and
"without loss of generality" OR "elementary". I want to get that stuff
out of the way, and certainly deduce as much as I can that might be
useful later.
Nearly a month now with no tobacco during the day, when I am out.
An equation I have seen in the elementary results is
x^p + y^p == x+y mod p, or something similar. That would make 4
equations in 4 unknowns.
Doug
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: FLTMA: A little group theory
- From: Chip Eastham
- Re: FLTMA: A little group theory
- From: The Dougster
- Re: FLTMA: A little group theory
- References:
- Re: FLTMA: A little group theory
- From: The Dougster
- Re: FLTMA: A little group theory
- From: The Dougster
- Re: FLTMA: A little group theory
- From: The Dougster
- Re: FLTMA: A little group theory
- From: The Dougster
- Re: FLTMA: A little group theory
- From: Chip Eastham
- Re: FLTMA: A little group theory
- From: The Dougster
- Re: FLTMA: A little group theory
- From: The Dougster
- Re: FLTMA: A little group theory
- From: Chip Eastham
- Re: FLTMA: A little group theory
- From: The Dougster
- Re: FLTMA: A little group theory
- From: Chip Eastham
- Re: FLTMA: A little group theory
- From: The Dougster
- Re: FLTMA: A little group theory
- From: Chip Eastham
- Re: FLTMA: A little group theory
- From: The Dougster
- Re: FLTMA: A little group theory
- From: The Dougster
- Re: FLTMA: A little group theory
- Prev by Date: Re: A question on algebraic circle fitting
- Next by Date: Re: FLTMA: A little group theory
- Previous by thread: Re: FLTMA: A little group theory
- Next by thread: Re: FLTMA: A little group theory
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|