Re: An uncountable countable set
- From: Virgil <virgil@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 24 Oct 2006 14:59:46 -0600
In article <453e4a85@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
Tony Orlow <tony@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
David Marcus wrote:
Tony Orlow wrote:
David Marcus wrote:
Tony Orlow wrote:We decide on the basis of whether 1/n=0. Is that possible for n in N?
David Marcus wrote:"If noon exists at all"? How do we decide?
Tony Orlow wrote:If noon exists at all, the vase is not empty. All finite naturals will
Your examples of the circle and rectangle are good. Neither has aDo you really mean to say that there is no vase at noon or do you mean
height
outside of its x range. The height of the circle is 0 at x=-1 and x=1,
because the circle actually exists there. To ask about its height at
x=9
is like asking how the air quality was on the 85th floor of the World
Trade Center yesterday. Similarly, it makes little sense to ask what
happens at noon. There is no vase at noon.
to say that the vase is not empty at noon?
have been removed, but an infinite number of infinitely-numbered balls
will remain.
Hmmmm......nope.
So, noon doesn't exist. And, there is no vase at noon. I thought you
were saying the vase contains an infinite number of balls at noon.
If the vase exists at noon, then it has an uncountable number of balls
labeled with infinite values. But, no infinite values are allowed i the
experiment, so this cannot happen, and noon is excluded.
So did the North Koreans nuke the vase before noon?
The only relevant issue is whether according to the rules set up in the
problem, is each ball inserted before noon also removed before noon?"
An affirmative confirms that the vase is empty at noon.
A negative directly violates the conditions of the problem.
How does TO answer?
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: An uncountable countable set
- From: Tony Orlow
- Re: An uncountable countable set
- References:
- Re: An uncountable countable set
- From: David R Tribble
- Re: An uncountable countable set
- From: Tony Orlow
- Re: An uncountable countable set
- From: David Marcus
- Re: An uncountable countable set
- From: Tony Orlow
- Re: An uncountable countable set
- From: David Marcus
- Re: An uncountable countable set
- From: Tony Orlow
- Re: An uncountable countable set
- From: David Marcus
- Re: An uncountable countable set
- From: Tony Orlow
- Re: An uncountable countable set
- From: David Marcus
- Re: An uncountable countable set
- From: Tony Orlow
- Re: An uncountable countable set
- From: imaginatorium
- Re: An uncountable countable set
- From: Tony Orlow
- Re: An uncountable countable set
- From: imaginatorium
- Re: An uncountable countable set
- From: Tony Orlow
- Re: An uncountable countable set
- From: imaginatorium
- Re: An uncountable countable set
- From: Tony Orlow
- Re: An uncountable countable set
- From: imaginatorium
- Re: An uncountable countable set
- From: Tony Orlow
- Re: An uncountable countable set
- From: David Marcus
- Re: An uncountable countable set
- From: Tony Orlow
- Re: An uncountable countable set
- From: David Marcus
- Re: An uncountable countable set
- From: Tony Orlow
- Re: An uncountable countable set
- From: David Marcus
- Re: An uncountable countable set
- From: Tony Orlow
- Re: An uncountable countable set
- Prev by Date: Re: An uncountable countable set
- Next by Date: Re: An uncountable countable set
- Previous by thread: Re: An uncountable countable set
- Next by thread: Re: An uncountable countable set
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading