Re: Cantor Confusion
- From: "MoeBlee" <jazzmobe@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 25 Oct 2006 13:32:54 -0700
Lester Zick wrote:
"Definition" in mathematics would appear to mean pretty much whatever
people who claim to do mathematics say it means.
No, in mathematical logic we prove that there are certain definitional
forms that meet the criteria of elminability and non-creativity.
Ex: Cardinality is
card(x)= least ordinal(x) equinumerous(x).
Where did you read that definition? It's nonsense.
The definition I gave, which is not nonsense, is:
card(x) = the least ordinal equinumerous with x.
MoeBlee
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Cantor Confusion
- From: Lester Zick
- Re: Cantor Confusion
- From: stephen
- Re: Cantor Confusion
- References:
- Re: Cantor Confusion
- From: MoeBlee
- Re: Cantor Confusion
- From: MoeBlee
- Re: Cantor Confusion
- From: *** T. Winter
- Re: Cantor Confusion
- From: David Marcus
- Re: Cantor Confusion
- From: Lester Zick
- Re: Cantor Confusion
- Prev by Date: Re: It can take 500 years
- Next by Date: Re: Cardinal subtraction, division and rooting:
- Previous by thread: Re: Cantor Confusion
- Next by thread: Re: Cantor Confusion
- Index(es):