Re: Sets and common border
- From: vreddyp@xxxxxxxxx
- Date: 25 Oct 2006 22:48:56 -0700
Tony Orlow wrote:
Again I would ask, do you have an application or context for the question?
Its just a minor problem.
I'm studying a system of circularly chained functions that partition
the R into sets with common
boundaries. I can express these sets using the current set concepts,
but it is not as ideal as it could be. For example, I'm expecting to
express the partition with something like {oo, x_1, x_2, x_3, -oo},
where x_1, x_2 and x_3 are numbers that serve as boundaries for these
partitions. May be this is possible only when the transition of
variable and its function at boundaries is smooth (no jumps) and
continuous.
Just to explain "circularly chained functions", these are some
algebraic functions that take certain number of input values and
produce certain number of output values just like a function in C
language. Chaining refers to feeding of outputs from certain functions
to other functions (many-to-many). Circularity refers the situation
where there are no dead-ends and all we have is loops of chained
functions. The interesting point is that, values at each chaining point
is constant irrespective of the path that you take, or the number of
the loops you make. I started calling these functions as "Lens
Functions" because thats how they looked when I graphed them. I can
provide more details, if you are interested.
- venkat
Tony
.
- References:
- Sets and common border
- From: vreddyp
- Re: Sets and common border
- From: William Elliot
- Re: Sets and common border
- From: vreddyp
- Re: Sets and common border
- From: Tony Orlow
- Re: Sets and common border
- From: vreddyp
- Re: Sets and common border
- From: Tony Orlow
- Sets and common border
- Prev by Date: Re: An uncountable countable set
- Next by Date: Re: Probability that the sum of n uniform-(0,1) variables is < 1, is 1/n!
- Previous by thread: Re: Sets and common border
- Next by thread: Re: Sets and common border
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|