Re: Riemann geometry, chicken or the egg?
- From: "Hero" <Hero.van.Jindelt@xxxxxx>
- Date: 27 Oct 2006 01:23:01 -0700
Hero schrieb:
Robert Israel schrieb:
....................................... Some Greeks did have a
heliocentric system, but the idea that the orbits were ellipses
seems not to have occurred to anybody before Kepler.
Wiki -german about Alexander Thom:
"Neben dem Maßsystem trug Thom auch zu einer tieferen Betrachtung der
Geometrie der megalithischen Steinkreise bei. Er klassifizierte sie in
sechs Typen: echte Kreise, Ellipsen, zwei Arten von eiförmigen Kreisen
und zwei Arten von abgeflachten Kreisen."
The megalithic astronomers thought about orbits, of course there is no
hint in this to a heliocentric system.
And more, an orbit with epicycles is not a circle.
And there is one problem for astronomers and calendar-makers:
count the days between of the four seasons between the equinoxes (day
and night with equal length) and the winter and summer solstice, this
does not divide the year into four equal parts. So, presumed sun is
moving on a circular orbit around earth, it should have different
speeds. So one will look for alternative orbits.
Hero
.
- References:
- Riemann geometry, chicken or the egg?
- From: bootlace
- Re: Riemann geometry, chicken or the egg?
- From: bootlace
- Re: Riemann geometry, chicken or the egg?
- From: Gerry Myerson
- Re: Riemann geometry, chicken or the egg?
- From: bootlace
- Re: Riemann geometry, chicken or the egg?
- From: Robert Israel
- Re: Riemann geometry, chicken or the egg?
- From: Hero
- Riemann geometry, chicken or the egg?
- Prev by Date: Re: An uncountable countable set
- Next by Date: Application of Birthday Paradox
- Previous by thread: Re: Riemann geometry, chicken or the egg?
- Next by thread: Re: Riemann geometry, chicken or the egg?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|