Re: Riemann geometry, chicken or the egg?
- From: Bob Kolker <nowhere@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 27 Oct 2006 11:40:08 -0400
bootlace wrote:
On 26 Oct 2006 16:40:27 GMT, israel@xxxxxxxxxxx (Robert Israel) wrote:
Asteroids and meteors streaking across the heavens were noted by the
Greeks and Chinese .
That meant they were in the atomosphere and burning up. So observing them (in that state) would not have yielded conic sections. Besides they were moving too fast for getting position fixes.
Bob Kolker
.
- References:
- Riemann geometry, chicken or the egg?
- From: bootlace
- Re: Riemann geometry, chicken or the egg?
- From: bootlace
- Re: Riemann geometry, chicken or the egg?
- From: Gerry Myerson
- Re: Riemann geometry, chicken or the egg?
- From: bootlace
- Re: Riemann geometry, chicken or the egg?
- From: Robert Israel
- Re: Riemann geometry, chicken or the egg?
- From: bootlace
- Riemann geometry, chicken or the egg?
- Prev by Date: Re: An uncountable countable set
- Next by Date: Re: An uncountable countable set
- Previous by thread: Re: Riemann geometry, chicken or the egg?
- Next by thread: Re: Riemann geometry, chicken or the egg?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|