Re: second partial derivatives commute (Clairaut's Thm.)
- From: israel@xxxxxxxxxxx (Robert Israel)
- Date: 30 Oct 2006 05:49:58 GMT
In article <1162175668.392176.46810@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
G Patel <gaya.patel@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
To guarantee f_xy (a,b) = f_yx (a,b), do we require that
f_xy, f_yx be
continuous at (a,b) or a stronger requirement ( continuity in some
neighbourhood of (a,b) )?
In Adams, "Calculus, A Complete Course" (third edition), sec.
13.4, the requirement is that f_{xy} and f_{yx} are
continuous at (a,b), while f, f_x and f_y are continuous in
a neighbourhood of (a,b).
Robert Israel israel@xxxxxxxxxxx
Department of Mathematics http://www.math.ubc.ca/~israel
University of British Columbia Vancouver, BC, Canada
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: second partial derivatives commute (Clairaut's Thm.)
- From: Dave L. Renfro
- Re: second partial derivatives commute (Clairaut's Thm.)
- From: smn
- Re: second partial derivatives commute (Clairaut's Thm.)
- References:
- second partial derivatives commute (Clairaut's Thm.)
- From: G Patel
- second partial derivatives commute (Clairaut's Thm.)
- Prev by Date: Re: Forbidden graph structures?
- Next by Date: Re: Application of Birthday Paradox
- Previous by thread: second partial derivatives commute (Clairaut's Thm.)
- Next by thread: Re: second partial derivatives commute (Clairaut's Thm.)
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|