Re: compactly suported diff. forms in R
- From: "Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz" <spamtrap@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 01 Nov 2006 07:09:52 -0500
In <3967133.1161666259151.JavaMail.jakarta@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, on
10/24/2006
at 01:03 AM, FrankL <teech7@xxxxxxxxxxx> said:
P.S: Are all these definitions of a the differential
of a 0-form being a gradient, of d( 1-form) being
a curl and d( 2-form) a divergence the setup for
doing calculus on manifolds?.
No, they're a setup for doing calculus on 3-manifolds with metrics.
Only the gradient has meaning in the general case.
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg and JOAT <http://patriot.net/~shmuel>
Unsolicited bulk E-mail subject to legal action. I reserve the
right to publicly post or ridicule any abusive E-mail. Reply to
domain Patriot dot net user shmuel+news to contact me. Do not
reply to spamtrap@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
.
- Prev by Date: Re: Cantor Confusion
- Next by Date: Re: Cantor Confusion
- Previous by thread: Re: Proof that counting is valid?
- Next by thread: Bayes classifier and Gaussian distribution
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|