Re: A new definition of natural numbers
- From: "kunzmilan" <kunzmilan@xxxxxxxx>
- Date: 3 Nov 2006 09:24:18 -0800
In a discussion, arguments should be used. I wrote, that it can be
discussed, if mathematical expressions for large numbers belong to
natural languages or or if they form an artificial language. No
substantial arguments supporting the first possibility appeared, only
arguments ad hominem. Most of mathematitians do not learn mathematical
formulas from their mothers. Therefore, it is not their maternal
language. Most of mathematical terms were invented only in last
centuries. It is thus a new language.
kunzmilan
.
- References:
- A new definition of natural numbers
- From: kunzmilan
- Re: A new definition of natural numbers
- From: Jon Slaughter
- Re: A new definition of natural numbers
- From: Tonico
- A new definition of natural numbers
- Prev by Date: Re: A new definition of natural numbers
- Next by Date: Re: Continuous injection from a subset of R^n to R
- Previous by thread: Re: A new definition of natural numbers
- Next by thread: Re: A new definition of natural numbers
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading