Re: A new definition of natural numbers

Tony Orlow wrote:
Well, Kunzmilan, I beg to differ. The binary representation of oo is
100...000. That has both a predecessor (the largest positive natural)
and successor (the largest negative integer). The only thing that needs
to be clarified is the exact level of uncountability in the ellipses.

So there exist an integer n such that: n + 1 > n + 5.
Therefore 1 > 5.

So, 1 USD > 5 USD. Excellent.

OK, let's make a deal: you give me 50'000 USD and I will give you
10'000 USD in exchange. It will be a beneficial deal for you ... This
is mathematically proven.

Theron

.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Canon 30D
    ... John A. Stovall wrote in ... ....just $700 USD more than the predecessor. ... The specs sound like what a lot of us have been asking for. ...
    (rec.photo.digital.slr-systems)
  • Re: A new definition of natural numbers
    ... Tony Orlow writes: ... That has both a predecessor ... and successor (the largest negative integer). ...
    (sci.math)
  • Re: A new definition of natural numbers
    ... That has both a predecessor ... and successor (the largest negative integer). ... TO hoist with his own petard! ...
    (sci.math)
  • Re: A new definition of natural numbers
    ... Tony Orlow wrote: ... That has both a predecessor ... and successor (the largest negative integer). ...
    (sci.math)