Re: A new definition of natural numbers
- From: "kunzmilan" <kunzmilan@xxxxxxxx>
- Date: 5 Nov 2006 23:59:58 -0800
I am glad that, at last, my message induced some discussion. I posted
many more important topics without any response (except a note that my
English is terrible).
Now, I know, at least, that my posts do not go into void.
I think that I found a path into the strange world of combinatorics.
It started long ago when I accidentally discovered that two famous
entropy functions H$ = -\sum p_j \log p_j$, as defined by Boltzmann
and Shannon, are two distinct functions derived
from two polynomial coefficients, contrary to generally accepted
views, and the negentropy principle.
I had a feeling as Cadet Biegler. Remember his desperate
ejaculation: ``Jesusmarja, Herr Major, es stimmt nicht!''. Senior
officers quietly listened the lecture about coding, but the given
example did not make sense, because they had at hand another volume
than prescribed by instructions. The name of the book was "Sunde
der Vater". Similarly as ?vejk, I think, that a book should be
read from its first volume.
It was almost impossible to publish my results, because they did not
conform with accepted views. My first attempt was rejected from
reason that my explanation was ununderstable. Being angry, I wrote
its essence for a technical journal for youth, where it was accepted
as suitable lecture for their naive readers. Till now, I was
not able to publish my result explicitly. The referees did not
accept my arguments. From many reasons. I was forced to continue my
research, discover new relations which proved my conception. There
are very elementary things about graph matrices which are not
explained in textbooks on their suitable place, it means at the
beginning.
kunzmilan
.
- References:
- A new definition of natural numbers
- From: kunzmilan
- Re: A new definition of natural numbers
- From: Jon Slaughter
- Re: A new definition of natural numbers
- From: Tonico
- Re: A new definition of natural numbers
- From: Eckard Blumschein
- A new definition of natural numbers
- Prev by Date: Re: Image of projective variety is closed
- Next by Date: Online LaTeX compilers
- Previous by thread: Re: A new definition of natural numbers
- Next by thread: Re: A new definition of natural numbers
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading