Re: Countability of real numbers

In article <45505E60.9060909@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
Eckard Blumschein <blumschein@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

On 11/7/2006 5:44 AM, Virgil wrote:

One can 'count' without memory if the only purpose of the counting is to
compare the relative sizes of two sets as smaller, equal or larger.

I rather prefer Archimedes.

You seem to prefer the dead in all things.
.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Countability of real numbers
    ... Eckard Blumschein wrote: ... compare the relative sizes of two sets as smaller, ... Archimedes is living at every new Field's medal. ...
    (sci.math)
  • Re: Countability of real numbers
    ... compare the relative sizes of two sets as smaller, ... You seem to prefer the dead in all things. ... Archimedes is living at every new Field's medal. ...
    (sci.math)
  • Re: Ultimate debunking of Cantors Theory
    ... IF one has a non-empty ordered set without a largest element, ... How can there be a "largest" if there is no ordering by which to compare ... plagiarize you. ...
    (sci.math)
  • Re: Countability of real numbers
    ... compare the relative sizes of two sets as smaller, ... I rather prefer Archimedes. ... Your logic alternatives are incomplete. ...
    (sci.math)
Quantcast