Re: Cantor Confusion

In article <1163180572.015523.176260@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
mueckenh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:

Virgil schrieb:


Why don't you try to find out how it could be presented in set theory?
Or why that cannot be done?

We have already seen why it cannot be done in ZF or NBG. It contradicts
the requirements of those systems.


You have seen nothing but the fact that it contradicts the *results* of
those systems.

Regards, WM

They are parts of the system. WM's claims violate ZF. ZFC. NBG, and
others without even having a completely stated set of assumptions.

Absent statement of a complete set of assumptions or rules, WM's
"system" is not even a system, but a game being played without rules.

Such unruly games are too uncertain for the needs of mathematics.
.