Re: Cantor Confusion

mueckenh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
David Marcus schrieb:
mueckenh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
No. The hidden errors can better be recognized at the roots.

Perhaps, but irrelevant. If you can't find the "hidden errors" in the
modern formulations, a likely explanation is that the "hidden errors"
have been removed in the process of changing the formulations.
Regardless, if the "hidden errors" are still there, your only hope of
convincing people is to point to them in the formulations that they
know.

The most fundamental hidden error is that sets are described a
potentially infinite (going on for ever) but taken and treated as if
they were actually infinite.

As I just said, you need to point to the errors in the formulations that
people currently use. If the error is "treating sets as if they are
actually infinite", please state what the error is using modern
terminology and/or give an example using modern terminology.

--
David Marcus
.

Quantcast