Re: Cantor Confusion
- From: David Marcus <DavidMarcus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 18 Nov 2006 12:22:28 -0500
Franziska Neugebauer wrote:
mueckenh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
Franziska Neugebauer schrieb:
mueckenh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
{1,2,3} is the collection of, and a convenient expression to write
{that we are talking about, the numbers 1 ,2, and 3.
What are we talking about, when we write
{ }
?
The same as when we write
Regards, WM
I would like to suggest the name "finished emptiness" for that.
We could simply agree that all symbols, letters, numerals denote
emptiness. This would mean that all posts in this thread are empty.
Perhaps it would be a fitting end to the discussion.
It seems rather perverse to insist that some symbols be replaced by
blanks. We aren't allowed to use whatever symbols we want?
--
David Marcus
.
- References:
- Re: Cantor Confusion
- From: *** T. Winter
- Re: Cantor Confusion
- From: mueckenh
- Re: Cantor Confusion
- From: *** T. Winter
- Re: Cantor Confusion
- From: mueckenh
- Re: Cantor Confusion
- From: Franziska Neugebauer
- Re: Cantor Confusion
- From: mueckenh
- Re: Cantor Confusion
- From: Franziska Neugebauer
- Re: Cantor Confusion
- Prev by Date: Re: Why Regularity?
- Next by Date: Re: Why Regularity?
- Previous by thread: Re: Cantor Confusion
- Next by thread: Re: Cantor Confusion
- Index(es):