Re: A new definition of natural numbers

Eckard Blumschein wrote:
1) not a single proven fundamental,
in particuls obvious misinterpretation of DA2

What is the misinterpretation?

4) students are urged to belive rather than understand

Are you referring to WM's students?

7) apparently nobody her is in position to defend transfinte set theory
by tangible factual arguments without insult and hoity-toity phrases

You mean if you don't understand something, but think you do, people
tell you that you are wrong. You reply with something incoherent. After
a while, people point out that you are being stupid (which you are). I
suppose that can feel like an insult (rather than merely a factual
statement). And, if you falsely believe that such people actually know
less than you, then you may misinterpret what they say as displaying
arrogance rather than simply providing factual arguments.

I would like to appeal to sufficiently intelligent open-minded people.

Unfortunately (for you), such people are unlikely to be convinced by
your incoherent ramblings, wild assertions, and appeals to dead
authorities whose works you've misunderstood.

Most likely, individuals like Virgil will not accept any deviating
opinion.

Virgil is unlikely to accept nonsense.

What about M., I disagree with him in part. He claimes that
there are physical limitations to numbers. I see numbers an independent
ideal concept. Also, I do not share his view on "intercession". He seems
not to follow yet my admittedly uncommon insight that the point of view
matters if one decides between contable and uncountable.

Oh, yes. Please do try to engage WM in a discussion. It could be quite
entertaining.

--
David Marcus
.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Re:_When_A_Homosexual_Christian_Leader_Comes_O?=
    ... yet seldom provide documentation to back up your claims. ... As for "insult dog", ... based on misinterpretation of biblical passages that results ... have to hide under vain repetition instead. ...
    (soc.religion.christian)
  • Re: A new definition of natural numbers
    ... in particuls obvious misinterpretation of DA2 ... Are you referring to WM's students? ... by tangible factual arguments without insult and hoity-toity phrases ... The Peano axioms? ...
    (sci.math)
  • Re: A new definition of natural numbers
    ... in particuls obvious misinterpretation of DA2 ... Are you referring to WM's students? ... by tangible factual arguments without insult and hoity-toity phrases ...
    (sci.math)