Re: Suffix language
- From: Jussi Piitulainen <jpiitula@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 19 Nov 2006 18:13:47 +0200
pgn@xxxxxxxxx writes:
Another question.
Can anybody show me how to proof somethin like this.
Suffix of word A is any end part of word A (i.e. A=abbb, so suffixes
are: empty, b, bb, bbb, abbb).
So if L is regular language then suffix-language is also regular.
I know how to do it for preffixes.
It's pretty much the same for suffixes but in reverse, assuming the
way you do it for prefixes is the same that I have in mind.
It's not important for this construction that the automaton be
deterministic. Just think of a path from a start state to a final
state. If you have to insist on a single start state, use empty
transitions as usual.
.
- References:
- Suffix language
- From: pgn
- Suffix language
- Prev by Date: Re: An Invitation to Quantum Mathematics
- Next by Date: Re: Cantor Confusion
- Previous by thread: Suffix language
- Next by thread: Calculating an average vector
- Index(es):