Re: Cantor Confusion
- From: stephen@xxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Mon, 20 Nov 2006 18:43:05 +0000 (UTC)
David Marcus <DavidMarcus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
mueckenh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
No. A well-order of the real numbers is not definable. A well-order of
the real numbers cannot be given by a list. There is no other means
which could well-order the real numbers. To believe that it exists
(where should it exist?) is a certificate of distinguished madness at
an advanced level.
Why do things that "exist" have to exist "somewhere"? Where does the
number five exist?
Right next to the number four? :)
Stephen
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Cantor Confusion
- From: David Marcus
- Re: Cantor Confusion
- References:
- Re: Cantor Confusion
- From: mueckenh
- Re: Cantor Confusion
- From: Virgil
- Re: Cantor Confusion
- From: mueckenh
- Re: Cantor Confusion
- From: Virgil
- Re: Cantor Confusion
- From: David Marcus
- Re: Cantor Confusion
- Prev by Date: Re: An Invitation to Quantum Mathematics
- Next by Date: Re: JSH: Scary, eh?
- Previous by thread: Re: Cantor Confusion
- Next by thread: Re: Cantor Confusion
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|