Re: JSH: Use ratings


jstevh@xxxxxxx wrote:
Wilf.Rosenbaum@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
jstevh@xxxxxxx wrote:
People coming in with Google Groups can rate posts, and I'd like more
people to start rating to help me pick which people to reply to.

If this experiment works, I'll start going more by group opinions on
posts.

I'd like to try and see if more of the crap posters can be weeded out
in this way, as they are down-rated to a level that I know I can
completely ignore them from now on.


Among those who reply to your posts, who do you consider not to be a
"crap poster"?

I like factual people who manage to either find real errors, who I
prized most highly in the past during brainstorming phases, and people
who are objective, especially in term of bringing up real issues.

Could you name, say, half a dozen specific individuals that fit your
description: that found real errors and that you prize most highly?

.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: JSH: Use ratings
    ... people to start rating to help me pick which people to reply to. ... I'll start going more by group opinions on ... I'd like to try and see if more of the crap posters can be weeded out ... Among those who reply to your posts, who do you consider not to be a ...
    (sci.math)
  • Re: JSH: Use ratings
    ... people to start rating to help me pick which people to reply to. ... I'll start going more by group opinions on ... I'd like to try and see if more of the crap posters can be weeded out ... Among those who reply to your posts, who do you consider not to be a ...
    (sci.math)