Re: Taylor's Theorem
- From: lite.on.beta@xxxxxxxxx
- Date: 25 Nov 2006 19:41:36 -0800
Also, for multivariable calculus, does anyone have a reference to the
most accurate and most general form of Taylor's theorem?
I've seen two forms of the theorem with different hypotheses:
1) Requires k+1 order partial derivatives to be continuous on some
neighbourhood of the reference point. Then says for every x in that
neighbourhood, there exists a c in line segment joining ref. point and
x such that...
2) Requires k+1 order partial derivative to be continuous on line
segment joining reference point and x. Then says there exists a c in
this line segment such that....
The second form is more general than the first, but there must be a
reason the first form was stated that way in Apostol's Calculus volume
1 (among other places). Anyone know if the 2nd form is valid?
.
- References:
- Taylor's Theorem
- From: lite . on . beta
- Taylor's Theorem
- Prev by Date: Re: Cantor Confusion
- Next by Date: Re: nice,erdos,can. math bull
- Previous by thread: Taylor's Theorem
- Next by thread: Re: Taylor's Theorem
- Index(es):