sci.math

• Date Index

---

• ILLC Research Reports and Technical Notes 2006, Marco Vervoort,P.315,+31 20 525 6519,,
• Meaning of "either-or", bluelabel
• difficult question, tamiry
  • Re: difficult question, Daniel Mayost
• Egyptian fractal, Antonio González
• on logic, ¬a\\/b
  • Re: on logic, mensanator@xxxxxxxxxxx
• a few more general GRE math problems, john
  • Re: a few more general GRE math problems, Daniel Mayost
    • Re: a few more general GRE math problems, Peacenik
  • Re: a few more general GRE math problems, Nick
  • Re: a few more general GRE math problems, Dana DeLouis
  • Re: a few more general GRE math problems, pauldepstein
  • Re: a few more general GRE math problems, Cary
  • Re: a few more general GRE math problems, David T. Ashley
• The Origin Of Jesus Christ - @ YouTube, TOR Hershman
• general gre math problem, john
  • Re: general gre math problem, Ted Hwa
    • Re: general gre math problem, David T. Ashley
      • Re: general gre math problem, john
      • Re: general gre math problem, The Qurqirish Dragon
  • Re: general gre math problem, jmorriss@xxxxxxxxxxx
  • Re: general gre math problem, Nick
• Re: correcting Dik Winter's attempt at Euclid's Infinitude of Prime..., Robert Maas, see http://tinyurl.com/uh3t
  • Re: correcting Dik Winter's attempt at Euclid's Infinitude of Prime..., Tim Peters
  • Re: correcting Dik Winter's attempt at Euclid's Infinitude of Prime..., Michael Press
• base 10 number system, bob
  • Re: base 10 number system, mensanator@xxxxxxxxxxx
    • Re: base 10 number system, Nick
  • Re: base 10 number system, David T. Ashley
    • Re: base 10 number system, Nick
      • Re: base 10 number system, The Ghost In The Machine
      • Re: base 10 number system, Nick
      • Re: base 10 number system, The Ghost In The Machine
      • Re: base 10 number system, Stephen Montgomery-Smith
  • Re: base 10 number system, hagman
  • Re: base 10 number system, Peacenik
    • Re: base 10 number system, Nick
    • Re: base 10 number system, porky_pig_jr@xxxxxxxxxxx
      • Re: base 10 number system, mensanator@xxxxxxxxxxx
• domain notation for a function, sean_in_cali
  • Re: domain notation for a function, vishvas
  • Re: domain notation for a function, William Elliot
• passive radar theory refrence needed, Peter Divos
• Laplace's rule of succession, Scott H
• Pythagorean theorem, theory of area, Rupert
• Article: Joint Mathematics Meetings in New Orleans January 5-8, 2007, Robert Karl Stonjek
• Large composites with just two prime factors of equal length., fasttrack2a
  • Re: Large composites with just two prime factors of equal length., fasttrack2a
• Interesting Math Books?, C
  • Re: Interesting Math Books?, David T. Ashley
    • Re: Interesting Math Books?, Stephen Montgomery-Smith
      • Re: Interesting Math Books?, David T. Ashley
      • Re: Interesting Math Books?, David C . Ullrich
    • Re: Interesting Math Books?, Nick
  • Re: Interesting Math Books?, Ivar Rosquist
  • Re: Interesting Math Books?, Stephen J. Herschkorn
  • Re: Interesting Math Books?, Kira Yamato
  • Re: Interesting Math Books?, Cary
  • Re: Interesting Math Books?, T.H. Ray
  • Re: Interesting Math Books?, David Bernier
  • Re: Interesting Math Books?, Nick
  • Re: Interesting Math Books?, John Coleman
  • Re: Interesting Math Books?, mathedman
    • Re: Interesting Math Books?, Tonico
• Hessian Matrix - A stupid question, Thomchad
  • Re: Hessian Matrix - A stupid question, gowan4@xxxxxxxxxxx
    • Re: Hessian Matrix - A stupid question, Thomchad
• f and f' square integrable, Fedor
  • Re: f and f' square integrable, Stephen Montgomery-Smith
    • Re: f and f' square integrable, Fedor
      • Re: f and f' square integrable, Stephen Montgomery-Smith
      • Re: f and f' square integrable, David C . Ullrich
• SO(n) and O(n) questions, James
  • Re: SO(n) and O(n) questions, José Carlos Santos
    • Re: SO(n) and O(n) questions, James
      • Re: SO(n) and O(n) questions, Timothy Murphy
    • Re: SO(n) and O(n) questions, Lee Rudolph
      • Re: SO(n) and O(n) questions, James
      • Re: SO(n) and O(n) questions, Lee Rudolph
      • Re: SO(n) and O(n) questions, José Carlos Santos
  • Re: SO(n) and O(n) questions, David Bernier
• On The Fundamental Theorem of Arithmetic and Why it Breaks Down for the Algebraics, The Ghost In The Machine
  • Re: On The Fundamental Theorem of Arithmetic and Why it Breaks Down for the Algebraics, Arturo Magidin
    • Re: On The Fundamental Theorem of Arithmetic and Why it Breaks Down for the Algebraics, The Ghost In The Machine
• Simple Geometry Problem, david bandel
  • Re: Simple Geometry Problem, Randy Poe
    • Re: Simple Geometry Problem, David W . Cantrell
• distribution of n point on the unit circle, Ralf Goertz
  • Re: distribution of n point on the unit circle, matt271829-news
    • Re: distribution of n point on the unit circle, Ralf Goertz
  • Message not available
    • Re: distribution of n point on the unit circle, Ralf Goertz
      • Message not available
      • Re: distribution of n point on the unit circle, Ralf Goertz
      • Message not available
      • Re: distribution of n point on the unit circle, matt271829-news
  • Message not available
    • Re: distribution of n point on the unit circle, matt271829-news
• Hilbert space inequality, PublicJY
  • Re: Hilbert space inequality, Robert Israel
• JSH: It IS fraud, jstevh
  • Re: JSH: It IS fraud, jankrihau
  • Re: JSH: It IS fraud, David C . Ullrich
    • Re: JSH: It IS fraud, Gib Bogle
  • Re: JSH: It IS fraud, hagman
  • Re: JSH: It IS fraud, Randy Poe
  • Re: JSH: It IS fraud, Jim Ferry
  • Re: JSH: It IS fraud, Gonçalo Rodrigues
    • Re: JSH: It IS fraud, nospam
    • Re: JSH: It IS fraud, Proginoskes
  • Re: JSH: It IS fraud, Rupert
• inverse gradient, Jon Slaughter
  • Re: inverse gradient, Proginoskes
    • Re: inverse gradient, Jon Slaughter
    • Message not available
      • Re: inverse gradient, Jon Slaughter
    • Message not available
      • Re: inverse gradient, Robert Israel
      • Re: inverse gradient, Lee Rudolph
  • Re: inverse gradient, Jon Slaughter
• Bijective mappings of real functions, theronruiz
  • Re: Bijective mappings of real functions, Dave Seaman
    • Re: Bijective mappings of real functions, theronruiz
• using modular symbols with magma, Oswald Kluge
• Tricky Calculus Problem, Eliza
  • Re: Tricky Calculus Problem, hagman
    • Re: Tricky Calculus Problem, Eliza
      • Re: Tricky Calculus Problem, hagman
      • Re: Tricky Calculus Problem, Eliza
  • Re: Tricky Calculus Problem, Stephen J. Herschkorn
    • Re: Tricky Calculus Problem, hagman
      • Re: Tricky Calculus Problem, Eliza
  • Re: Tricky Calculus Problem, Michael Hennebry
• relative error for 'zero' input, Dejfson
  • Re: relative error for 'zero' input, hagman
    • Re: relative error for 'zero' input, David W . Cantrell
      • Re: relative error for 'zero' input, Dejfson
      • Re: relative error for 'zero' input, David W . Cantrell
      • Re: relative error for 'zero' input, Dejfson
      • Re: relative error for 'zero' input, hagman
• Difficult PDE, Sotto
• isomorphisms and modulus, eugene
  • Re: isomorphisms and modulus, Jannick Asmus
  • Re: isomorphisms and modulus, hagman
  • Re: isomorphisms and modulus, David C . Ullrich
• An inequality involving sqrt., jseppa17@xxxxxxxxx
  • Re: An inequality involving sqrt., David C . Ullrich
    • Re: An inequality involving sqrt., hagman
• How to use MSExcel to plot Column A against Col B?, joyo
  • Re: How to use MSExcel to plot Column A against Col B?, José Carlos Santos
  • Re: How to use MSExcel to plot Column A against Col B?, hagman
    • Re: How to use MSExcel to plot Column A against Col B?, mensanator@xxxxxxxxxxx
• unknown function, Philips
  • Re: unknown function, David C . Ullrich
• eigenvalues of products of matrices, splotint
  • Re: eigenvalues of products of matrices, hagman
    • Re: eigenvalues of products of matrices, Jannick Asmus
      • Re: eigenvalues of products of matrices, hagman
      • Re: eigenvalues of products of matrices, Jannick Asmus
  • Re: eigenvalues of products of matrices, fernando revilla
  • Re: eigenvalues of products of matrices, Jannick Asmus
• Boolean Algebra / Karnaugh Maps with N > 2 (Higher Dimensions), David T. Ashley
• Galileo's Paradox and the Project of the Reals, Six Letters
  • Re: Galileo's Paradox and the Project of the Reals, hagman
    • Re: Galileo's Paradox and the Project of the Reals, G . Frege
      • Re: Galileo's Paradox and the Project of the Reals, G . Frege
      • Re: Galileo's Paradox and the Project of the Reals, hagman
    • Re: Galileo's Paradox and the Project of the Reals, Virgil
  • Re: Galileo's Paradox and the Project of the Reals, guenther vonKnakspot
  • Re: Galileo's Paradox and the Project of the Reals, G . Frege
  • Re: Galileo's Paradox and the Project of the Reals, Tony Orlow
    • Re: Galileo's Paradox and the Project of the Reals, Robert Maas, see http://tinyurl.com/uh3t
      • Re: Galileo's Paradox and the Project of the Reals, Tony Orlow
      • Re: Galileo's Paradox and the Project of the Reals, Virgil
• Group of order 720, rsvirk
  • Re: Group of order 720, Derek Holt
    • Re: Group of order 720, rsvirk
    • Re: Group of order 720, Kira Yamato
      • Re: Group of order 720, Kira Yamato
    • Re: Group of order 720, Kira Yamato
      • Re: Group of order 720, Derek Holt
• Re: 2.058833711777943011170351... = ? continued fraction convergents//, don . lotto
  • Re: 2.058833711777943011170351... = > 2 + (1 / (17 - (1 / (340 - (1 / (8.5 + (1 / 51))))))) = 2.05883371//, don . lotto
  • Re: 2.058833711777943011170351... = ? continued fraction convergents//, Proginoskes
    • Re: 2.058833711777943011170351... = ? continued fraction convergents//, Robert Israel
      • Re: 2.058833711777943011170351... = ? continued fraction convergents//, Proginoskes
      • Re: 2.058833711777943011170351... = ? continued fraction convergents//, Robert Israel
• Spivak, Calculus on Manifolds, Self-study, Problem 1-6, Marc
  • Re: Spivak, Calculus on Manifolds, Self-study, Problem 1-6, José Carlos Santos
    • Re: Spivak, Calculus on Manifolds, Self-study, Problem 1-6, Marc
  • Re: Spivak, Calculus on Manifolds, Self-study, Problem 1-6, junoexpress
    • Re: Spivak, Calculus on Manifolds, Self-study, Problem 1-6, junoexpress
      • Re: Spivak, Calculus on Manifolds, Self-study, Problem 1-6, Marc
• courses in video, J
  • Re: courses in video, Marc
  • Re: courses in video, raymond manzoni
• Re: Method of Frobenius, G.E. Ivey
• Divergent summation/could someone confirm these?, Gottfried Helms
• are imaginary exponents "truly" defined that way?, bennett
  • Re: are imaginary exponents "truly" defined that way?, Robert Israel
    • Re: are imaginary exponents "truly" defined that way?, bennett
  • Re: are imaginary exponents "truly" defined that way?, galathaea
    • Re: are imaginary exponents "truly" defined that way?, Hero
  • Re: are imaginary exponents "truly" defined that way?, matt271829-news
    • Re: are imaginary exponents "truly" defined that way?, bennett
      • Re: are imaginary exponents "truly" defined that way?, matt271829-news
      • Re: are imaginary exponents "truly" defined that way?, bennett
      • Re: are imaginary exponents "truly" defined that way?, hagman
      • Re: are imaginary exponents "truly" defined that way?, The Ghost In The Machine
  • Re: are imaginary exponents "truly" defined that way?, Stephen J. Herschkorn
• free old books on discrete maths and/or algorithms, emekadavid
  • Re: free old books on discrete maths and/or algorithms, Nick Evans
• help with an estimate, Philips
  • Re: help with an estimate, Jannick Asmus
• Leonhard Euler Tercentenary - Basel 2007, The Last Danish Pastry
  • Re: Leonhard Euler Tercentenary - Basel 2007, Lee Rudolph
    • Re: Leonhard Euler Tercentenary - Basel 2007, The Last Danish Pastry
• A matrix group, Hauke Reddmann
  • Re: A matrix group, José Carlos Santos
    • Re: A matrix group, Lee Rudolph
  • Re: A matrix group, Jannick Asmus
  • Re: A matrix group, Herman Rubin
• probability of at least n successes with m tries, Patrik Stellmann
  • Re: probability of at least n successes with m tries, Randy Poe
    • Re: probability of at least n successes with m tries, diligent . snail
      • Re: probability of at least n successes with m tries, Randy Poe
      • Re: probability of at least n successes with m tries, diligent . snail
    • Re: probability of at least n successes with m tries, Patrik Stellmann
  • Re: probability of at least n successes with m tries, matt271829-news
    • Re: probability of at least n successes with m tries, Patrik Stellmann
• Re: maths gene project, Nick
• Pop Math - Huzita-Hatori Origami constructions, joshipura
  • Re: Pop Math - Huzita-Hatori Origami constructions, Hero
• Re: Internet Security Warning!, Nick
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Internet Security Warning!, hagman
  • Re: Internet Security Warning!, Aatu Koskensilta
• Re: Sudoku questions, Nick
• Prime Numbers, Quantum Ranger
  • Re: Prime Numbers, Proginoskes
    • Re: Prime Numbers, William Elliot
      • Re: Prime Numbers, pauldepstein
      • Re: Prime Numbers, William Elliot
      • Re: Prime Numbers, Michael Press
      • Re: Prime Numbers, David T. Ashley
      • Re: Prime Numbers, Klueless
      • Re: Prime Numbers, Robert Maas, see http://tinyurl.com/uh3t
    • Re: Prime Numbers, Quantum Ranger
    • Re: Prime Numbers, Quantum Ranger
      • Re: Prime Numbers, Nick
• THE RAIN STOPS!, hackerlubiao@xxxxxxxxx
• when fn -> f => fn' -> f', Diego Torquemada
  • Re: when fn -> f => fn' -> f', José Carlos Santos
    • Re: when fn -> f => fn' -> f', Dave L. Renfro
      • Re: when fn -> f => fn' -> f', Dave L. Renfro
  • Re: when fn -> f => fn' -> f', David C . Ullrich
• Generalized Riemann Zeta Function in Mathematica, junoexpress
  • Re: Generalized Riemann Zeta Function in Mathematica, Valeri Astanoff
• solve 2-order differential eqn, d2x/dt2 = 1/(1+cx.) hard? to me it isxx, don . lotto
• a(n) = (tan 1)(tan 2)(tan 3) . . . (tan n): Diverges?, Leonard M. Wapner
  • [] a(n) = (tan 1)(tan 2)(tan 3) . . . (tan n): Diverges?, William Elliot
  • Re: a(n) = (tan 1)(tan 2)(tan 3) . . . (tan n): Diverges?, David Bernier
    • Re: a(n) = (tan 1)(tan 2)(tan 3) . . . (tan n): Diverges?, Proginoskes
      • Re: a(n) = (tan 1)(tan 2)(tan 3) . . . (tan n): Diverges?, Denis Feldmann
      • Re: a(n) = (tan 1)(tan 2)(tan 3) . . . (tan n): Diverges?, David W . Cantrell
      • Re: a(n) = (tan 1)(tan 2)(tan 3) . . . (tan n): Diverges?, David W . Cantrell
      • Re: a(n) = (tan 1)(tan 2)(tan 3) . . . (tan n): Diverges?, David Bernier
      • Re: a(n) = (tan 1)(tan 2)(tan 3) . . . (tan n): Diverges?, David C. Ullrich
      • Re: a(n) = (tan 1)(tan 2)(tan 3) . . . (tan n): Diverges?, David Bernier
      • Re: a(n) = (tan 1)(tan 2)(tan 3) . . . (tan n): Diverges?, Herman Rubin
      • Re: a(n) = (tan 1)(tan 2)(tan 3) . . . (tan n): Diverges?, toni . lassila
      • Re: a(n) = (tan 1)(tan 2)(tan 3) . . . (tan n): Diverges?, David Bernier
  • Re: a(n) = (tan 1)(tan 2)(tan 3) . . . (tan n): Diverges?, Kira Yamato
    • Re: a(n) = (tan 1)(tan 2)(tan 3) . . . (tan n): Diverges?, Kira Yamato
      • Re: a(n) = (tan 1)(tan 2)(tan 3) . . . (tan n): Diverges?, Robert Israel
  • Re: a(n) = (tan 1)(tan 2)(tan 3) . . . (tan n): Diverges?, Leonard M. Wapner
• single clock circuit <-> polynomial, dillogimp
• moving averages, Jon Slaughter
  • Re: moving averages, nospam
  • Re: moving averages, Randy Poe
  • Re: moving averages, junoexpress
• Re: *** Wolfowitz owes us an explanation ***, Squidward Tentacles
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: *** Wolfowitz owes us an explanation ***, Squidward Tentacles
  • Re: *** Wolfowitz owes us an explanation ***, Squidward Tentacles
  • Re: *** Wolfowitz owes us an explanation ***, Squidward Tentacles
• Books about groups, bluelabel
  • Re: Books about groups, Nick
• Irrational Inclusion - can irrational numbers contain other irrational numbers?, Martin Winer
  • Re: Irrational Inclusion - can irrational numbers contain other irrational numbers?, user923005
  • Re: Irrational Inclusion - can irrational numbers contain other irrational numbers?, Gottfried Helms
  • Re: Irrational Inclusion - can irrational numbers contain other irrational numbers?, Robert Israel
    • Re: Irrational Inclusion - can irrational numbers contain other irrational numbers?, Martin Winer
    • Re: Irrational Inclusion - can irrational numbers contain other irrational numbers?, David C . Ullrich
• Re: Proof of Infinitude of Twin Primes has a Indirect Method but Di..., Robert Maas, see http://tinyurl.com/uh3t
• Convergance checking of log, stork
  • Re: Convergance checking of log, user923005
    • Re: Convergance checking of log, user923005
      • Re: Convergance checking of log, user923005
      • Re: Convergance checking of log, user923005
      • Re: Convergance checking of log, user923005
• Gauss-function, derivatives & integrals(?), Gottfried Helms
• Re: satisfying Dik Winter's objection Re: proof of Infinitude of Tw..., Robert Maas, see http://tinyurl.com/uh3t
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: satisfying Dik Winter's objection Re: proof of Infinitude of Tw..., Robert Maas, see http://tinyurl.com/uh3t
  • Re: satisfying Dik Winter's objection Re: proof of Infinitude of Tw..., Robert Maas, see http://tinyurl.com/uh3t
• Lasting the longest, hagen
• Re: satisfying Dik Winter's objection Re: proof of Infinitude of ..., Robert Maas, see http://tinyurl.com/uh3t
• Re: Gauss should have realized there is a flaw in the Euclid Infini..., Robert Maas, see http://tinyurl.com/uh3t
  • Re: Gauss should have realized there is a flaw in the Euclid Infini..., Proginoskes
• New IRC Channel: #moderncalcs, RadSurfer
• I need your help for my University dissertation, Emily
  • Re: I need your help for my University dissertation, hagman
  • Re: I need your help for my University dissertation, Nick
• topological lemma, Philips
• Re: Solving a * 0 = 0 Plankenstein Monster "IT'S ALLLLiiiiiivvvvvvvve !!!", huangxienchen
  • Re: Solving a * 0 = 0 Plankenstein Monster "IT'S ALLLLiiiiiivvvvvvvve !!!", David C . Ullrich
  • Re: Solving a * 0 = 0 Plankenstein Monster "IT'S ALLLLiiiiiivvvvvvvve !!!", Randy Poe
    • Re: Solving a * 0 = 0 Plankenstein Monster "IT'S ALLLLiiiiiivvvvvvvve !!!", huangxienchen
      • Re: Solving a * 0 = 0 Plankenstein Monster "IT'S ALLLLiiiiiivvvvvvvve !!!", David C . Ullrich
  • Re: Solving a * 0 = 0 Plankenstein Monster "IT'S ALLLLiiiiiivvvvvvvve !!!", William Elliot
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Solving a * 0 = 0 Plankenstein Monster "IT'S ALLLLiiiiiivvvvvvvve !!!", huangxienchen
    • Re: Solving a * 0 = 0 Plankenstein Monster "IT'S ALLLLiiiiiivvvvvvvve !!!", Randy Poe
      • Re: Solving a * 0 = 0 Plankenstein Monster "IT'S ALLLLiiiiiivvvvvvvve !!!", huangxienchen
      • Re: Solving a * 0 = 0 Plankenstein Monster "IT'S ALLLLiiiiiivvvvvvvve !!!", huangxienchen
      • Re: Solving a * 0 = 0 Plankenstein Monster "IT'S ALLLLiiiiiivvvvvvvve !!!", David C . Ullrich
      • Re: Solving a * 0 = 0 Plankenstein Monster "IT'S ALLLLiiiiiivvvvvvvve !!!", Randy Poe
      • Re: Solving a * 0 = 0 Plankenstein Monster "IT'S ALLLLiiiiiivvvvvvvve !!!", G . Frege
    • [] Solving a * 0 = 0 Plankenstein Monster "IT'S ALLLLiiiiiivvvvvvvve !!!", William Elliot
    • Re: Solving a * 0 = 0 Plankenstein Monster "IT'S ALLLLiiiiiivvvvvvvve !!!", David C . Ullrich
      • Re: Solving a * 0 = 0 Plankenstein Monster "IT'S ALLLLiiiiiivvvvvvvve !!!", William Elliot
      • Re: Solving a * 0 = 0 Plankenstein Monster "IT'S ALLLLiiiiiivvvvvvvve !!!", huangxienchen
      • Re: Solving a * 0 = 0 Plankenstein Monster "IT'S ALLLLiiiiiivvvvvvvve !!!", David C . Ullrich
      • Re: Solving a * 0 = 0 Plankenstein Monster "IT'S ALLLLiiiiiivvvvvvvve !!!", huangxienchen
      • Re: Solving a * 0 = 0 Plankenstein Monster "IT'S ALLLLiiiiiivvvvvvvve !!!", Randy Poe
      • Re: Solving a * 0 = 0 Plankenstein Monster "IT'S ALLLLiiiiiivvvvvvvve !!!", huangxienchen
      • Re: Solving a * 0 = 0 Plankenstein Monster "IT'S ALLLLiiiiiivvvvvvvve !!!", huangxienchen
      • Re: Solving a * 0 = 0 Plankenstein Monster "IT'S ALLLLiiiiiivvvvvvvve !!!", Randy Poe
      • Re: Solving a * 0 = 0 Plankenstein Monster "IT'S ALLLLiiiiiivvvvvvvve !!!", huangxienchen
      • Re: Solving a * 0 = 0 Plankenstein Monster "IT'S ALLLLiiiiiivvvvvvvve !!!", David C . Ullrich
      • Re: Solving a * 0 = 0 Plankenstein Monster "IT'S ALLLLiiiiiivvvvvvvve !!!", huangxienchen
      • Re: Solving a * 0 = 0 Plankenstein Monster "IT'S ALLLLiiiiiivvvvvvvve !!!", hagman
      • Re: Solving a * 0 = 0 Plankenstein Monster "IT'S ALLLLiiiiiivvvvvvvve !!!", huangxienchen
      • Re: Solving a * 0 = 0 Plankenstein Monster "IT'S ALLLLiiiiiivvvvvvvve !!!", hagman
      • Re: Solving a * 0 = 0 Plankenstein Monster "IT'S ALLLLiiiiiivvvvvvvve !!!", huangxienchen
      • Re: Solving a * 0 = 0 Plankenstein Monster "IT'S ALLLLiiiiiivvvvvvvve !!!", huangxienchen
      • Re: Solving a * 0 = 0 Plankenstein Monster "IT'S ALLLLiiiiiivvvvvvvve !!!", huangxienchen
      • Re: Solving a * 0 = 0 Plankenstein Monster "IT'S ALLLLiiiiiivvvvvvvve !!!", T.H. Ray
      • Re: Solving a * 0 = 0 Plankenstein Monster "IT'S ALLLLiiiiiivvvvvvvve !!!", huangxienchen
      • Re: Solving a * 0 = 0 Plankenstein Monster "IT'S ALLLLiiiiiivvvvvvvve !!!", T.H. Ray
      • Re: Solving a * 0 = 0 Plankenstein Monster "IT'S ALLLLiiiiiivvvvvvvve !!!", huangxienchen
      • Re: Solving a * 0 = 0 Plankenstein Monster "IT'S ALLLLiiiiiivvvvvvvve !!!", T.H. Ray
      • Re: Solving a * 0 = 0 Plankenstein Monster "IT'S ALLLLiiiiiivvvvvvvve !!!", huangxienchen
      • Re: Solving a * 0 = 0 Plankenstein Monster "IT'S ALLLLiiiiiivvvvvvvve !!!", T.H. Ray
      • Re: Solving a * 0 = 0 Plankenstein Monster "IT'S ALLLLiiiiiivvvvvvvve !!!", huangxienchen
      • Calling all Geese - Calling all Geese -, huangxienchen
      • Re: Calling all Geese - Calling all Geese -, The Ghost In The Machine
      • Re: Calling all Geese - Calling all Geese -, huangxienchen
      • Re: Calling all Geese - Calling all Geese -, T.H. Ray
      • Re: Calling all Geese - Calling all Geese -, huangxienchen
      • Re: Calling all Geese - Calling all Geese -, T.H. Ray
      • Re: Calling all Geese - Calling all Geese -, huangxienchen
      • Re: Calling all Geese - Calling all Geese -, T.H. Ray
      • Re: Calling all Geese - Calling all Geese -, huangxienchen
      • Re: Calling all Geese - Calling all Geese -, huangxienchen
      • Re: Calling all Geese - Calling all Geese -, William Elliot
      • Re: Calling all Geese - Calling all Geese -, huangxienchen
      • Re: Calling all Geese - Calling all Geese -, The Ghost In The Machine
• Analysis on manifolds, BACH
  • Re: Analysis on manifolds, smn
    • Re: Analysis on manifolds, BACH
  • Re: Analysis on manifolds, Stephen Montgomery-Smith
    • Re: Analysis on manifolds, BACH
• an equation, gilevgi
  • Re: an equation, José Carlos Santos
    • Re: an equation, Nick
      • Re: an equation, José Carlos Santos
      • Re: an equation, Nick
      • Re: an equation, [Mr.] Lynn Kurtz
      • Re: an equation, Nick
• Re: proof of Infinitude of Twin Primes; applying Math Induction on ..., Robert Maas, see http://tinyurl.com/uh3t
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: proof of Infinitude of Twin Primes; applying Math Induction on ..., Robert Maas, see http://tinyurl.com/uh3t
• free and easy number to talk things through -, easyrider80
  • Re: free and easy number to talk things through -, Ken Pledger
• Re: World's first valid proof of Euclid Infinitude of Primes ..., Robert Maas, see http://tinyurl.com/uh3t
  • Re: World's first valid proof of Euclid Infinitude of Primes ..., Proginoskes
    • Re: World's first valid proof of Euclid Infinitude of Primes ..., Robert Maas, see http://tinyurl.com/uh3t
      • Re: World's first valid proof of Euclid Infinitude of Primes ..., Proginoskes
• reverse order of integration, rancid moth
  • Re: reverse order of integration, Virgil
  • Re: reverse order of integration, barrera . mauro
• Re: correcting Dik Winter's attempt at Euclid's Infinitude of ..., Robert Maas, see http://tinyurl.com/uh3t
• Re: correcting Dik Winter and Chris Heckman's Euclid Infinitude of Primes ..., Robert Maas, see http://tinyurl.com/uh3t
  • Re: correcting Dik Winter and Chris Heckman's Euclid Infinitude of Primes ..., Proginoskes
• any one recognize this sequence?, dillogimp
  • Re: any one recognize this sequence?, Larry Hammick
    • Re: any one recognize this sequence?, dillogimp
      • Re: any one recognize this sequence?, Larry Hammick
      • Re: any one recognize this sequence?, Tim Peters
      • Re: any one recognize this sequence?, Larry Hammick
      • Re: any one recognize this sequence?, mensanator@xxxxxxxxxxx
      • Re: any one recognize this sequence?, hagman
      • Re: any one recognize this sequence?, Larry Hammick
  • Re: any one recognize this sequence?, amzoti
    • Re: any one recognize this sequence?, Gottfried Helms
• Complex differentiable functions, tamiry
  • Re: Complex differentiable functions, Kira Yamato
  • Re: Complex differentiable functions, Jannick Asmus
  • Re: Complex differentiable functions, David C . Ullrich
• ambiguous names?, zxcv_890
  • Re: ambiguous names?, mensanator@xxxxxxxxxxx
    • Re: ambiguous names?, Nick
      • Re: ambiguous names?, mensanator@xxxxxxxxxxx
  • Re: ambiguous names?, Stephen Montgomery-Smith
  • Re: ambiguous names?, Nick
  • Re: ambiguous names?, Dave L. Renfro
    • Re: ambiguous names?, David W . Cantrell
      • Re: ambiguous names?, Robert Israel
      • Re: ambiguous names?, Herman Rubin
      • Re: ambiguous names?, Dave Seaman
    • Re: ambiguous names?, zxcv_890
    • Re: ambiguous names?, Nick
  • Re: ambiguous names?, hagman
    • Re: ambiguous names?, Nick
      • Re: ambiguous names?, Robert Israel
      • Re: ambiguous names?, Kira Yamato
      • Re: ambiguous names?, Robert Israel
      • Re: ambiguous names?, hagman
      • Re: ambiguous names?, Proginoskes
      • Re: ambiguous names?, Nick
    • Re: ambiguous names?, zxcv_890
      • Re: ambiguous names?, Dik T. Winter
    • Re: ambiguous names?, Nick
  • Re: ambiguous names?, G . Frege
    • Re: ambiguous names?, Peter L. Montgomery
  • Re: ambiguous names?, Proginoskes
    • Re: ambiguous names?, Dik T. Winter
• log|x| locally integrable, boris
  • Re: log|x| locally integrable, Stephen Montgomery-Smith
• Determining which percentage of a sample belongs to a sample set, jd6strings
  • Re: Determining which percentage of a sample belongs to a sample set, Nick
    • Re: Determining which percentage of a sample belongs to a sample set, jd6strings
      • Re: Determining which percentage of a sample belongs to a sample set, Robert Israel
      • Re: Determining which percentage of a sample belongs to a sample set, jd6strings
      • Re: Determining which percentage of a sample belongs to a sample set, Nick
      • Re: Determining which percentage of a sample belongs to a sample set, jd6strings
      • Re: Determining which percentage of a sample belongs to a sample set, Robert Israel
      • Re: Determining which percentage of a sample belongs to a sample set, Nick
• What are the design issues for a mathematical operator?, m7ossny
  • Re: What are the design issues for a mathematical operator?, Robert Israel
    • Re: What are the design issues for a mathematical operator?, William Elliot
      • Re: What are the design issues for a mathematical operator?, m7ossny
      • Re: What are the design issues for a mathematical operator?, William Elliot
      • Re: What are the design issues for a mathematical operator?, Michael Olea
      • Re: What are the design issues for a mathematical operator?, m7ossny
• Can you do for 18sec, try!!, Anton11
  • Re: Can you do for 18sec, try!!, Nick
• algebraic order of cyclotomic numbers, Don Reble
  • Re: algebraic order of cyclotomic numbers, galathaea
  • Re: algebraic order of cyclotomic numbers, Robert Israel
  • Re: algebraic order of cyclotomic numbers, Keith Ramsay
    • Re: algebraic order of cyclotomic numbers, JoeS
      • Re: algebraic order of cyclotomic numbers, Robert Israel
    • Re: algebraic order of cyclotomic numbers, Don Reble
• Re: 4 8 15 16 23 42 Aproximate Pi, fred . zakity
• Riemann surface and its topology, singau
  • Re: Riemann surface and its topology, Lee Rudolph
    • Re: Riemann surface and its topology, singau
      • Re: Riemann surface and its topology, Lee Rudolph
• Numerical Integration Question, junoexpress
  • Re: Numerical Integration Question, Stephen Montgomery-Smith
    • Re: Numerical Integration Question, junoexpress
• Gradent conceptualization idea, Jon Slaughter
• Extending the reals, David R Tribble
  • Re: Extending the reals, Denis Feldmann
  • Re: Extending the reals, cbrown
    • Re: Extending the reals, David R Tribble
      • Re: Extending the reals, Ross A. Finlayson
      • Re: Extending the reals, David R Tribble
      • Re: Extending the reals, Ross A. Finlayson
      • Re: Extending the reals, Tony Orlow
      • Re: Extending the reals, David R Tribble
      • Re: Extending the reals, Tony Orlow
      • Re: Extending the reals, Ross A. Finlayson
  • Re: Extending the reals, hagman
    • Re: Extending the reals, cbrown
    • Re: Extending the reals, David R Tribble
      • Re: Extending the reals, David R Tribble
• Re: correcting Euclid's proof of the Infinitude of Primes which ..., Robert Maas, see http://tinyurl.com/uh3t
  • Re: correcting Euclid's proof of the Infinitude of Primes which ..., Proginoskes
• Re: World's first valid proof of Euclid Infinitude of Primes which opens up a avenue to easily prove Infinitude of Twin Primes Re: correcting Euclid, Robert Maas, see http://tinyurl.com/uh3t
  • Re: World's first valid proof of Euclid Infinitude of Primes which opens up a avenue to easily prove Infinitude of Twin Primes Re: correcting Euclid, Proginoskes
• J. London Math. Society is digitized, Dave L. Renfro
• RM3 logic ?, 2Pac
• Integral, Joris
  • Re: Integral, José Carlos Santos
  • Re: Integral, N. Silver
  • Re: Integral, N. Silver
• Re: correcting Euclid's proof of the Infinitude of Primes which leads to an easy proof of the Infinitude of Twin Primes ..., Robert Maas, see http://tinyurl.com/uh3t
  • Re: correcting Euclid's proof of the Infinitude of Primes which leads to an easy proof of the Infinitude of Twin Primes ..., Proginoskes
• Riemann's Hypothesis, Srinidhi
  • Re: Riemann's Hypothesis, David Marcus
  • Re: Riemann's Hypothesis, Larry Hammick
• about tangent space at a point, Philips
  • Re: about tangent space at a point, Jannick Asmus
    • Re: about tangent space at a point, Philips
      • Re: about tangent space at a point, Jannick Asmus
  • Re: about tangent space at a point, Dave L. Renfro
• How to turn of auto-updating eq.numbering in MathType 5.0, Ikar
  • Re: How to turn of auto-updating eq.numbering in MathType 5.0, Bob Mathews
    • Re: How to turn of auto-updating eq.numbering in MathType 5.0, Ikar
      • Re: How to turn of auto-updating eq.numbering in MathType 5.0, Ikar
    • Re: How to turn of auto-updating eq.numbering in MathType 5.0, Ikar
      • Re: How to turn of auto-updating eq.numbering in MathType 5.0, Bob Mathews
      • Re: How to turn of auto-updating eq.numbering in MathType 5.0, Ikar
• Statistica Sinica -- theme issue on statistical challenges in brain science, Statistica Sinica
• About 3n+1 problem, babu
  • [] About 3n+1 problem, William Elliot
  • Re: About 3n+1 problem, kilian heckrodt
  • Re: About 3n+1 problem, Bob Kolker
• algebra with cyclic and normal., mina_world
  • Re: algebra with cyclic and normal., Kira Yamato
    • Re: algebra with cyclic and normal., mina_world
  • Re: algebra with cyclic and normal., Tonico
  • Re: algebra with cyclic and normal., hagman
  • Re: algebra with cyclic and normal., Arturo Magidin
• axiom of choice from..., Saurav
  • Re: axiom of choice from..., William Elliot
    • Re: axiom of choice from..., saurav1b
      • Re: axiom of choice from..., Arturo Magidin
      • Re: axiom of choice from..., Arturo Magidin
      • Re: axiom of choice from..., Saurav
      • Re: axiom of choice from..., Stephen J. Herschkorn
      • Message not available
      • Re: axiom of choice from..., Arturo Magidin
      • Message not available
      • Re: axiom of choice from..., Stephen J. Herschkorn
• Computing Euler's totient function, Protoman
  • Re: Computing Euler's totient function, Robert Mabee
    • Re: Computing Euler's totient function, Tonico
  • Re: Computing Euler's totient function, Valeri Astanoff
    • Re: Computing Euler's totient function, Valeri Astanoff
  • Re: Computing Euler's totient function, Michael Harrington
• Permutation of maximum cycle, vincent64@xxxxxxxxx
  • Re: Permutation of maximum cycle, hagman
  • Re: Permutation of maximum cycle, Derek Holt
    • Re: Permutation of maximum cycle, Butch Malahide
• Small set Theory:final version., zuhair
  • Re: Small set Theory:final version., zuhair
  • Re: Small set Theory:final version., MoeBlee
    • Re: Small set Theory:final version., zuhair
      • Re: Small set Theory:final version., MoeBlee
      • Re: Small set Theory:final version., zuhair
• PI, Charlie Johnson
  • Re: PI, Larry Hammick
    • Message not available
      • Re: PI, Rob Johnson
      • Re: PI, Ken Pledger
      • Re: PI, Ioannis
  • Re: PI, Stephen Montgomery-Smith
  • Re: PI, Cary
  • Re: PI, The World Wide Wade
  • Re: PI, Saurav
  • Re: PI, T.H. Ray
• Is continuum completely filled up?, ooo
  • Re: Is continuum completely filled up?, [Mr.] Lynn Kurtz
  • Re: Is continuum completely filled up?, Virgil
  • Re: Is continuum completely filled up?, David Marcus
    • Re: Is continuum completely filled up?, William Elliot
    • Re: Is continuum completely filled up?, ooo
      • Re: Is continuum completely filled up?, Randy Poe
      • Re: Is continuum completely filled up?, ooo
      • Re: Is continuum completely filled up?, Randy Poe
      • Re: Is continuum completely filled up?, ooo
      • Re: Is continuum completely filled up?, G.E. Ivey
      • Re: Is continuum completely filled up?, Dave Seaman
      • Re: Is continuum completely filled up?, ooo
      • Re: Is continuum completely filled up?, Dave Seaman
      • Re: Is continuum completely filled up?, Robert Maas, see http://tinyurl.com/uh3t
      • Re: Is continuum completely filled up?, Dave Seaman
      • Re: Is continuum completely filled up?, ooo
      • Re: Is continuum completely filled up?, Dave Seaman
      • Re: Is continuum completely filled up?, ooo
      • Re: Is continuum completely filled up?, Dave Seaman
      • Re: Is continuum completely filled up?, ooo
      • Re: Is continuum completely filled up?, Dave Seaman
      • Re: Is continuum completely filled up?, Robert Maas, see http://tinyurl.com/uh3t
      • Re: Is continuum completely filled up?, Dave Seaman
      • Re: Is continuum completely filled up?, Dave Seaman
  • Re: Is continuum completely filled up?, kunzmilan
    • Re: Is continuum completely filled up?, Hero
      • Re: Is continuum completely filled up?, ooo
      • Re: Is continuum completely filled up?, Hero
    • Re: Is continuum completely filled up?, ooo
      • Re: Is continuum completely filled up?, David R Tribble
      • Re: Is continuum completely filled up?, Hero
      • Re: Is continuum completely filled up?, Hero
      • Re: Is continuum completely filled up?, ooo
      • Re: Is continuum completely filled up?, Jonathan Hoyle
  • Re: Is continuum completely filled up?, mathedman
  • Re: Is continuum completely filled up?, Richard Tobin
    • Re: Is continuum completely filled up?, ooo
      • Re: Is continuum completely filled up?, Richard Tobin
      • Re: Is continuum completely filled up?, Lester Zick
      • Re: Is continuum completely filled up?, Hero
      • Re: Is continuum completely filled up?, Lester Zick
      • Re: Is continuum completely filled up?, Hero
      • Re: Is continuum completely filled up?, Lester Zick
      • Re: Is continuum completely filled up?, Hero
  • Re: Is continuum completely filled up?, guenther vonKnakspot
  • Re: Is continuum completely filled up?, Saurav
    • Re: Is continuum completely filled up?, ooo
  • Re: Is continuum completely filled up?, Robert Maas, see http://tinyurl.com/uh3t
    • Re: Is continuum completely filled up?, ooo
      • Re: Is continuum completely filled up?, Dave Seaman
      • Re: Is continuum completely filled up?, Saurav
      • Re: Is continuum completely filled up?, toshiaki
      • Re: Is continuum completely filled up?, Hero
• dyscalculia, joana.moreira
  • Re: dyscalculia, Nick
  • Re: dyscalculia, elly
  • Re: dyscalculia, kellrobinson
    • Re: dyscalculia, Nick
• latin squares having permutations as row differences, andy
  • Re: latin squares having permutations as row differences, Randy Poe
    • Re: latin squares having permutations as row differences, andy
  • Re: latin squares having permutations as row differences, Ken Pledger
• Encode freq. in waveform, Mark Waugh
• [Exercise] Double cosets, bluelabel
• A Number Theory problem., science guy
  • Re: A Number Theory problem., Daniel Mayost
    • Re: A Number Theory problem., Michael
      • Re: A Number Theory problem., Daniel Mayost
  • Re: A Number Theory problem., christian.bau
  • Re: A Number Theory problem., Michael
• Ranking scheme using partial set amalgamation, Brablo
• Equation problem, zaheer7buet
  • Re: Equation problem, Nick
  • Re: Equation problem, Nick
• Sum of a series ..., Hassan Jameel
  • Re: Sum of a series ..., Daniel Mayost
    • Re: Sum of a series ..., Daniel Mayost
      • Re: Sum of a series ..., Hassan Jameel
• (geometric problem) Explain with the proper equation, ashisht4u
  • Re: (geometric problem) Explain with the proper equation, Tonico
  • Re: (geometric problem) Explain with the proper equation, Prawt
    • Re: (geometric problem) Explain with the proper equation, science guy
      • Re: (geometric problem) Explain with the proper equation, Randy Poe
      • Re: (geometric problem) Explain with the proper equation, Virgil
      • Re: (geometric problem) Explain with the proper equation, ashisht4u
    • Re: (geometric problem) Explain with the proper equation, science guy
• Another Galois theory question, Rupert
  • Re: Another Galois theory question, Derek Holt
• bundles, Philips
  • Re: bundles, Bob Kolker
    • Re: bundles, Philips
      • Re: bundles, Lee Rudolph
      • Re: bundles, conesetter
      • Re: bundles, Philips
• Coefficient Inverse Problem, Maka Karalashvili
• Study Abroad, Harry
• Union of a family of comparable measurable sets is measurable?, Kamjah Kogumah
  • Re: Union of a family of comparable measurable sets is measurable?, Dave L. Renfro
    • Re: Union of a family of comparable measurable sets is measurable?, Dave L. Renfro
  • Re: Union of a family of comparable measurable sets is measurable?, Kira Yamato
    • Re: Union of a family of comparable measurable sets is measurable?, Gonçalo Rodrigues
    • Re: Union of a family of comparable measurable sets is measurable?, David C . Ullrich
      • Re: Union of a family of comparable measurable sets is measurable?, Kira Yamato
      • Re: Union of a family of comparable measurable sets is measurable?, David C . Ullrich
      • Re: Union of a family of comparable measurable sets is measurable?, Kira Yamato
      • Re: Union of a family of comparable measurable sets is measurable?, David C . Ullrich
      • Re: Union of a family of comparable measurable sets is measurable?, Butch Malahide
      • Re: Union of a family of comparable measurable sets is measurable?, Dave Seaman
  • Re: Union of a family of comparable measurable sets is measurable?, Dave L. Renfro
  • Re: Union of a family of comparable measurable sets is measurable?, Gonçalo Rodrigues
    • Re: Union of a family of comparable measurable sets is measurable?, David C . Ullrich
      • Re: Union of a family of comparable measurable sets is measurable?, Butch Malahide
      • Re: Union of a family of comparable measurable sets is measurable?, Gonçalo Rodrigues
      • Re: Union of a family of comparable measurable sets is measurable?, Butch Malahide
      • Re: Union of a family of comparable measurable sets is measurable?, David C . Ullrich
  • Re: Union of a family of comparable measurable sets is measurable?, David C . Ullrich
    • Re: Union of a family of comparable measurable sets is measurable?, Dave L. Renfro
      • Re: Union of a family of comparable measurable sets is measurable?, David C . Ullrich
  • Re: Union of a family of comparable measurable sets is measurable?, Dave L. Renfro
    • Re: Union of a family of comparable measurable sets is measurable?, Butch Malahide
      • Re: Union of a family of comparable measurable sets is measurable?, Butch Malahide
  • Re: Union of a family of comparable measurable sets is measurable?, Stephen J. Herschkorn
    • Re: Union of a family of comparable measurable sets is measurable?, Stephen J. Herschkorn
• Not Commission , guranteed Income on-line., Alam
• A New Idea: "Transproof", Saurav
• Least Squares Vector Problem, David T. Ashley
  • Re: Least Squares Vector Problem, toni . lassila
    • Re: Least Squares Vector Problem, David T. Ashley
  • Re: Least Squares Vector Problem, matt271829-news
• How to calculate number of possible combinations, Leo Muller
  • Re: How to calculate number of possible combinations, Proginoskes
  • Re: How to calculate number of possible combinations, Kira Yamato
  • Re: How to calculate number of possible combinations, sammyspop
• Re: diophantine eq., Ashay Burungale
  • [] diophantine eq., William Elliot
• Uncountable numbers?, Andrew Usher
  • Re: Uncountable numbers?, Aatu Koskensilta
  • Re: Uncountable numbers?, Virgil
  • Re: Uncountable numbers?, Gc
    • Re: Uncountable numbers?, David C . Ullrich
      • Re: Uncountable numbers?, Gc
      • Re: Uncountable numbers?, Virgil
      • Re: Uncountable numbers?, Gc
      • Re: Uncountable numbers?, David C . Ullrich
      • Re: Uncountable numbers?, Lee Rudolph
      • Re: Uncountable numbers?, David C . Ullrich
      • Re: Uncountable numbers?, David C . Ullrich
      • Re: Uncountable numbers?, saurav1b
      • Re: Uncountable numbers?, David C . Ullrich
      • Re: Uncountable numbers?, Lee Rudolph
      • Re: Uncountable numbers?, David C . Ullrich
      • Re: Uncountable numbers?, Dave Seaman
      • Re: Uncountable numbers?, David C . Ullrich
      • Re: Uncountable numbers?, Dave Seaman
      • Re: Uncountable numbers?, Saurav
      • Re: Uncountable numbers?, David C . Ullrich
      • Re: Uncountable numbers?, Saurav
  • Re: Uncountable numbers?, David C . Ullrich
  • Re: Uncountable numbers?, Randy Poe
    • Re: Uncountable numbers?, Andrew Usher
      • Re: Uncountable numbers?, Randy Poe
      • Re: Uncountable numbers?, David W . Cantrell
      • Re: Uncountable numbers?, Saurav
      • Re: Uncountable numbers?, David C . Ullrich
      • Re: Uncountable numbers?, Dik T. Winter
• Proof by contradiction, Andrew Usher
  • Re: Proof by contradiction, N. Silver
    • Re: Proof by contradiction, G . Frege
    • Re: Proof by contradiction, Michael Press
  • Re: Proof by contradiction, William Elliot
    • Re: Proof by contradiction, Berk Birand
      • Re: Proof by contradiction, William Elliot
  • Re: Proof by contradiction, Virgil
    • Re: Proof by contradiction, Andrew Usher
      • Re: Proof by contradiction, Virgil
    • Re: Proof by contradiction, zzbunker@xxxxxxxxxxxx
      • Re: Proof by contradiction, Virgil
  • Re: Proof by contradiction, Aatu Koskensilta
    • Re: Proof by contradiction, Andrew Usher
      • Re: Proof by contradiction, Aatu Koskensilta
      • Re: Proof by contradiction, Virgil
      • Re: Proof by contradiction, Andrew Usher
      • Re: Proof by contradiction, N. Silver
      • Re: Proof by contradiction, Virgil
      • Re: Proof by contradiction, David Marcus
      • Re: Proof by contradiction, Virgil
      • Re: Proof by contradiction, Dik T. Winter
      • Re: Proof by contradiction, David Marcus
      • Re: Proof by contradiction, Virgil
      • Re: Proof by contradiction, Andrew Usher
      • Re: Proof by contradiction, Bob Kolker
      • Re: Proof by contradiction, Virgil
      • Re: Proof by contradiction, Bob Kolker
  • Re: Proof by contradiction, Bob Kolker
  • Re: Proof by contradiction, fernando revilla
  • Re: Proof by contradiction, Randy Poe
  • Re: Proof by contradiction, Stephen J. Herschkorn
  • Re: Proof by contradiction, Nick
    • Re: Proof by contradiction, Dave Seaman
      • Re: Proof by contradiction, Nick
• Gradient, Eric
  • Re: Gradient, William Elliot
    • Re: Gradient, Robert Israel
• A finite model for Peano arithmetic in some exotic logic ?, 2Pac
  • Re: A finite model for Peano arithmetic in some exotic logic ?, William Elliot
    • Re: A finite model for Peano arithmetic in some exotic logic ?, 2Pac
      • Re: A finite model for Peano arithmetic in some exotic logic ?, William Elliot
      • Re: A finite model for Peano arithmetic in some exotic logic ?, Jason H. Goodfriend
  • Re: A finite model for Peano arithmetic in some exotic logic ?, Keith Ramsay
• n (n + 1), Prawt
  • Re: n (n + 1), fernando revilla
  • Re: n (n + 1), fernando revilla
  • Re: n (n + 1), Dik T. Winter
    • Re: n (n + 1), Peter L. Montgomery
      • n(3n-11)=k^2 (was: n (n + 1)), Rainer Rosenthal
      • Re: n(3n-11)=k^2 (was: n (n + 1)), Peter L. Montgomery
      • Re: n(3n-11)=k^2, Rainer Rosenthal
      • Re: n(3n-11)=k^2, raymond manzoni
      • Re: n(3n-11)=k^2, raymond manzoni
      • Re: n(3n-11)=k^2, raymond manzoni
      • Re: n(3n-11)=k^2, Rainer Rosenthal
      • Re: n(3n-11)=k^2, raymond manzoni
      • Re: n(3n-11)=k^2, Rainer Rosenthal
  • Re: n (n + 1), Bob Kolker
  • Re: n (n + 1), bill
• Sports seeding, john0714@xxxxxxx
  • Re: Sports seeding, mensanator@xxxxxxxxxxx
• does positive K-S entropy imply mixing?, Charlotte
• Control Chart, surjit
• Gray Codes & Hamiltonian Circuits, Costas Vlachos
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Gray Codes & Hamiltonian Circuits, Costas Vlachos
    • Re: Gray Codes & Hamiltonian Circuits, louis
      • Re: Gray Codes & Hamiltonian Circuits, Costas Vlachos
    • Re: Gray Codes & Hamiltonian Circuits, Costas Vlachos
      • Re: Gray Codes & Hamiltonian Circuits, Proginoskes
      • Re: Gray Codes & Hamiltonian Circuits, Costas Vlachos
• Erdos' unfinished work, Erdos Groupie
  • Re: Erdos' unfinished work, Bart Goddard
• another general GRE math problem, john
  • Re: another general GRE math problem, karl
  • Re: another general GRE math problem, Kira Yamato
• Specialised Highschools for Mathematics and Physics?, canadian . in . kirov
  • Re: Specialised Highschools for Mathematics and Physics?, William Elliot
  • Re: Specialised Highschools for Mathematics and Physics?, Dave L. Renfro
    • Re: Specialised Highschools for Mathematics and Physics?, Dave L. Renfro
    • Re: Specialised Highschools for Mathematics and Physics?, N. Silver
• Re: correcting Euclid's proof of the Infinitude of Primes which leads to an easy proof of the Infinitude of Twin Primes; both Dik Winter and Chris Heckman have failed attempts, G . Frege
• Re: JSH: Re-visiting planet Contrary, Red
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: JSH: Re-visiting planet Contrary, Red
• Galois theory question, Rupert
• .·:*¨¨*:·.·:*¨¨*:·.♥ Merry Christmas ♥.·:*¨¨*:·.·:*¨¨*:·., Information
  • Re: .·:*¨¨*:·.·:*¨¨*:·.♥ Merry Christmas ♥.·:*¨¨*:·.·:*¨¨*:·., yahala
• Series, Eric
  • Re: Series, William Elliot
    • Re: Series, David C . Ullrich
    • Re: Series, Ioannis
      • Re: Series, Badger
      • Re: Series, Ioannis
      • Re: Series, Badger
  • Re: Series, Cary
• Progress in prime number theory, Dilip
• multivariate extreme value distribution, andrubuntu
• 3D Modeling in Mathematica, Rick Davis
• ANR spaces, ddaniel . lopez
  • Re: ANR spaces, Zbigniew Karno
    • Re: ANR spaces, ddaniel . lopez
      • Re: ANR spaces, Zbigniew Karno
      • Re: ANR spaces, Zbigniew Karno
• Curvature, dick . fischbeck
• independence of parallel postulate -- why isn't it this easy?, bennett
  • Re: independence of parallel postulate -- why isn't it this easy?, mathman
    • Re: independence of parallel postulate -- why isn't it this easy?, bennett
      • Re: independence of parallel postulate -- why isn't it this easy?, Lee Rudolph
      • Re: independence of parallel postulate -- why isn't it this easy?, David C . Ullrich
      • Re: independence of parallel postulate -- why isn't it this easy?, Lee Rudolph
      • Re: independence of parallel postulate -- why isn't it this easy?, Rupert
      • Re: independence of parallel postulate -- why isn't it this easy?, Peter Webb
      • Re: independence of parallel postulate -- why isn't it this easy?, Bob Kolker
      • Re: independence of parallel postulate -- why isn't it this easy?, Peter Webb
      • Re: independence of parallel postulate -- why isn't it this easy?, David C . Ullrich
      • Re: independence of parallel postulate -- why isn't it this easy?, Hero
    • Re: independence of parallel postulate -- why isn't it this easy?, David C . Ullrich
  • Re: independence of parallel postulate -- why isn't it this easy?, Rupert
    • Re: independence of parallel postulate -- why isn't it this easy?, Rupert
  • Re: independence of parallel postulate -- why isn't it this easy?, Proginoskes
• Dilworth's Easy Theorem, William Elliot
  • Re: Dilworth's Easy Theorem, Butch Malahide
    • Re: Dilworth's Easy Theorem, William Elliot
• Vector Product- A clarification, Farooq W
  • Re: Vector Product- A clarification, William Elliot
• Re: MONKEY UNDER CHRISTMAS TREE, William Elliot
• help with a definition: homotopy equivalence, Philips
  • Re: help with a definition: homotopy equivalence, David C . Ullrich
    • Re: help with a definition: homotopy equivalence, Philips
      • Re: help with a definition: homotopy equivalence, David C . Ullrich
      • Re: help with a definition: homotopy equivalence, Philips
  • Re: help with a definition: homotopy equivalence, Saurav
• Data stream on search engine -- A challenge, Mathematician
  • Re: Data stream on search engine -- A challenge, William Elliot
• LATEX command, Saurav
  • Re: LATEX command, José Carlos Santos
• property of eigenvalue in principal components, nazanin
• video, Mathematician
  • Re: video, kilian heckrodt
    • Re: video, Mathematician
      • Re: video, kilian heckrodt
• Euler Bricks in higher dimensions?, helopticor
  • Re: Euler Bricks in higher dimensions?, Randall
• Re: JSH: Reasoning behind the hostility, Red
  • Re: JSH: Reasoning behind the hostility, Mathematician
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: JSH: Reasoning behind the hostility, Red
  • Re: JSH: Reasoning behind the hostility, Jesse F. Hughes
    • Re: JSH: Reasoning behind the hostility, Aatu Koskensilta
  • Re: JSH: Reasoning behind the hostility, mensanator@xxxxxxxxxxx
• JSH: Perspective is weird, jstevh
  • Re: JSH: Perspective is weird, Red
  • Re: JSH: Perspective is weird, Red
  • Re: JSH: Perspective is weird, Red
    • Re: JSH: Perspective is weird, Mathematician
      • Re: JSH: Perspective is weird, Proginoskes
      • Re: JSH: Perspective is weird, Larry Hammick
      • Re: JSH: Perspective is weird, Tim Peters
      • Re: JSH: Perspective is weird, Proginoskes
      • Re: JSH: Perspective is weird, Proginoskes
  • Re: Perspective is weird, louis
  • Re: JSH: Perspective is weird, Rupert
• ZFC's replacement axiom:not 2nd order?, Saurav
  • Re: ZFC's replacement axiom:not 2nd order?, Stephen Montgomery-Smith
    • Re: ZFC's replacement axiom:not 2nd order?, Saurav
      • Re: ZFC's replacement axiom:not 2nd order?, Stephen Montgomery-Smith
      • Re: ZFC's replacement axiom:not 2nd order?, Saurav
      • Re: ZFC's replacement axiom:not 2nd order?, ¬a\\/b
      • Re: ZFC's replacement axiom:not 2nd order?, ¬a\\/b
      • Re: ZFC's replacement axiom:not 2nd order?, Stephen Montgomery-Smith
    • Re: ZFC's replacement axiom:not 2nd order?, David C . Ullrich
      • Re: ZFC's replacement axiom:not 2nd order?, Stephen Montgomery-Smith
  • Re: ZFC's replacement axiom:not 2nd order?, David C . Ullrich
    • Re: ZFC's replacement axiom:not 2nd order?, Saurav
      • Re: ZFC's replacement axiom:not 2nd order?, David C . Ullrich
      • Re: ZFC's replacement axiom:not 2nd order?, Aatu Koskensilta
      • Re: ZFC's replacement axiom:not 2nd order?, Aatu Koskensilta
      • Re: ZFC's replacement axiom:not 2nd order?, Saurav
  • Re: ZFC's replacement axiom:not 2nd order?, Herman Rubin
• Dedekind's Infinite Sets., zuhair
  • Re: Dedekind's Infinite Sets., Saurav
    • Re: Dedekind's Infinite Sets., Saurav
  • Re: Dedekind's Infinite Sets., Virgil
    • Re: Dedekind's Infinite Sets., Saurav
      • Re: Dedekind's Infinite Sets., zuhair
      • Re: Dedekind's Infinite Sets., Saurav
      • Re: Dedekind's Infinite Sets., zuhair
      • Re: Dedekind's Infinite Sets., saurav1b
      • Re: Dedekind's Infinite Sets., zuhair
      • Re: Dedekind's Infinite Sets., Saurav
      • Re: Dedekind's Infinite Sets., zuhair
      • Re: Dedekind's Infinite Sets., Saurav
    • Re: Dedekind's Infinite Sets., zuhair
      • Re: Dedekind's Infinite Sets., Saurav
      • Re: Dedekind's Infinite Sets., Virgil
      • Re: Dedekind's Infinite Sets., zuhair
• Calculation of birth/death dates of BC people, Ioannis
  • Re: Calculation of birth/death dates of BC people, Randy Poe
    • Re: Calculation of birth/death dates of BC people, Ioannis
      • Re: Calculation of birth/death dates of BC people, Randy Poe
      • Re: Calculation of birth/death dates of BC people, Ioannis
      • Re: Calculation of birth/death dates of BC people, Robert Israel
      • Re: Calculation of birth/death dates of BC people, Ioannis
      • Re: Calculation of birth/death dates of BC people, zzbunker@xxxxxxxxxxxx
• A different version of the Maximal Triangle Problem, precarion
  • Re: A different version of the Maximal Triangle Problem, William Elliot
  • Re: A different version of the Maximal Triangle Problem, matt271829-news
    • Re: A different version of the Maximal Triangle Problem, precarion
• Is the Champernowne constant in some way related to the triangule numbers?, Gerard Schildberger
  • Re: Is the Champernowne constant in some way related to the triangule numbers? (corrected), Gerard Schildberger
• Cheap e-media solutions for your business., businessjoint
• *** ++++++ Bikini Clad Babes +++++ *** RapidScore Downloads...., google98.email5@xxxxxxxxxxx
• ellipse, qpwoeiruty
  • Re: ellipse, José Carlos Santos
  • Re: ellipse, Nobody
• Differentiating complex conjugate in respect to the complex, tamiry
  • Re: Differentiating complex conjugate in respect to the complex, Dave L. Renfro
  • Re: Differentiating complex conjugate in respect to the complex, D.Michael
  • Re: Differentiating complex conjugate in respect to the complex, David C . Ullrich
• is subtraction of subspaces defined?, ilandror
  • Re: is subtraction of subspaces defined?, Tonico
    • Re: is subtraction of subspaces defined?, tomerdr
  • Re: is subtraction of subspaces defined?, David C . Ullrich
    • Re: is subtraction of subspaces defined?, Proginoskes
      • Re: is subtraction of subspaces defined?, David C . Ullrich
    • Re: is subtraction of subspaces defined?, fernando revilla
• limit product question, rwalrus
  • Re: limit product question, José Carlos Santos
    • Re: limit product question, tamiry
      • Re: limit product question, rwalrus
  • Re: limit product question, Dave L. Renfro
  • Re: limit product question, Tonico
• Normalization of k[X] in K(k[X,Y]/(Y^2-X^3)), Kira Yamato
  • Re: Normalization of k[X] in K(k[X,Y]/(Y^2-X^3)), Trav
    • Re: Normalization of k[X] in K(k[X,Y]/(Y^2-X^3)), Kira Yamato
      • Re: Normalization of k[X] in K(k[X,Y]/(Y^2-X^3)), Lee Rudolph
• History of trigonometry, zeros
  • Re: History of trigonometry, kilian heckrodt
• Is an algebraic curve minus a finite number of points always affine?, Kira Yamato
  • Re: Is an algebraic curve minus a finite number of points always affine?, Jannick Asmus
    • Re: Is an algebraic curve minus a finite number of points always affine?, Kira Yamato
      • Re: Is an algebraic curve minus a finite number of points always affine?, Jannick Asmus
      • Re: Is an algebraic curve minus a finite number of points always affine?, Kira Yamato
      • Re: Is an algebraic curve minus a finite number of points always affine?, Timothy Murphy
      • Re: Is an algebraic curve minus a finite number of points always affine?, Kira Yamat