Re: Question for EB



Eckard Blumschein wrote:


While all these utterances of mine were meant just like mild criticism,
I still vehemently object against the German term ueberabzaehlbar and
argued for "nicht abzählbar" (uncountable). I got aware that it came up
just at the same time as Nitzsche lived very close to Cantor and coined
the horrible term Uebermensch.

I told you a while ago that this ("...Nitzsche lived very close to Cantor")
is wrong. Nietzsche came to Halle for medical treatment in the year before
Cantor arrived there. I gave solid proof of this from sources like Curt
Paul Janz' biography of Nietzsche. You, Mr. Blumschein, give solid proof
here that even facts which are established beyond reasonable doubt don't
impress you in the least in your weird world-view. Also, your babble about
the prefix "über" which is just the German counterpart of "over" or "super"
is still as stupid as it was last year. One needs übermenschliche
(superhuman) self-control in order not to bite into the table-top when
reading your nonsense.
.



Relevant Pages

  • Re: Cantors Ende
    ... >> Eckard Blumschein schrieb: ... >>> Lessingzitat Cantor einen offensichtlichen Fehler unterstellte, ... Ordnungszahlen, denen man Elemente von A zuordnen kann, gibt es ... > Eine Fliegenpilzsuppe wird doch durch ...
    (de.sci.mathematik)
  • Re: Weniger als alef
    ... >> Ich distanziere mich von Eckard Blumschein und seinen Äusserungen. ... Mein Newsreader zeigt das Subject im Pfad schon ... Ziehen habe Cantor nicht verstanden. ... Next by Date: ...
    (de.sci.mathematik)
  • Re: who is the most brilliant mathematician ever lived?
    ... > Eckard Blumschein wrote: ... >> that I regard all of the monument Cantor worth to be teared down. ... > So how does judaism fit into the picture? ... Be not mislead by Georg Cantors alephs. ...
    (sci.math)
  • Re: who is the most brilliant mathematician ever lived?
    ... Eckard Blumschein writes: ... > Are you brave enough as to find out from thread "Courage?" ... > Cantor was fundamentally wrong when he defined infinite cardinal numbers? ...
    (sci.math)