Re: Galileo's Paradox
- From: Eckard Blumschein <blumschein@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 29 Nov 2006 12:55:48 +0100
On 11/28/2006 10:31 PM, Virgil wrote:
There is no such thing as "genuine" for numbers in mathematics.
Maybe it will exist in genuine mathematics.
So that EB has just refused to accept all of Analysis, including
calculus, which is based on just the sort of sets that EB denies exist.
This is perhaps a lie. I feel well served by pre-Cantorian analysis and
by modern mathematics which does not really rely on set theory.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Galileo's Paradox
- From: Virgil
- Re: Galileo's Paradox
- Prev by Date: Re: Galileo's Paradox
- Next by Date: Re: Has bad mathematics lead to engineering disasters?
- Previous by thread: Re: Galileo's Paradox
- Next by thread: Re: Galileo's Paradox
- Index(es):
